AI Rate Professor

Art History

Elizabeth Bresnen

ART01 · ART001 · ART2A · ART1A · ART · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Avoid unless , and handle possible grading frustration.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude ToneBoring ClassBusy WorkUnclear TeachingMixed Helpfulness
  • Most negative , and boredom rather than raw difficulty.
  • The course can be manageable for grades, but students describe busy work and .
  • Evidence is weakened by many old reviews and only one recent review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The class can be easy if you attend and , but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material sounds easy to moderate, but boredom, writing tasks, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

The , and another review says showing up every day matters for an A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The negative comments are sharper than the praise, especially on attitude, clarity, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

because one student says an A is easy with attendance while another warns of a lower grade than expected.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is moderate because students mention response papers, essays, and a late nine-page project.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is poor overall because repeated , and boredom.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears mixed across writing, projects, and tests, but the .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lean negative, with repeated complaints about attitude, boredom, and .

Main concern

Students report , and busy writing-heavy work.

What students said

She was rude and condescending.
ART001
but the class is EXTREMELY BORING!!!
ART01
However, she was rude to the students, condescending, irritating, and .
ART2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove the .

Tests Mentioned
She would often mix up her facts and put subjects on the be on the test.
ART2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

However, she was rude to the students, condescending, irritating, and .

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting attitude, grading, and workload themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

Not a good teacher or nice person.

⚖️

45/100

expect atleast 1/2 - 1 full letter grade less than what you think you should get.

📚 Workload Pattern

45/100

it's an Art class but I felt as if this class was an English class due to all the response paper and essay writings.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was rude and condescending.
  • but the class is EXTREMELY BORING!!!
  • She helped me when she didn't have to and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is easy to get an A in her class if you show up everyday and .
  • expect atleast 1/2 - 1 full letter grade less than what you think you should get.
  • Pretty Easy if you have time to do a busy work

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • This class was a real waste for me.
  • Saves 9 page project that would have been helpful for the entire duration of the class for the last week.
  • Accused me of cheating when I was not.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

There are seven reviews, but most are very old and the opinions are inconsistent.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART0013 reviews
ART1 review
ART011 review
ART1A1 review
ART2A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values