AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Speech Communication

Beatriz Orozco

COMMD0001 · COMS18 · COMMD001 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you can tolerate poor organization and mostly learn on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedRude CommunicationTough GraderLecture HeavyMandatory Online Attendance
  • All three reviews give the professor the lowest quality rating.
  • Students say the work is not very hard, but the experience is hurt by poor organization, rude communication, and .
  • and , while the in-person review says attendance was not mandatory.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The work may be manageable, but tough grading, mandatory participation, and .

Online evidence points to tougher grading and , while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Students say the communication course work itself is not hard, but poor teaching makes it harder to benefit from.

Online reviews call the work okay or not hard, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

but mandatory in both online reviews.

, while the single in-person review reports attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Every reviewer and describes a strongly negative experience.

Both online and the professor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

20/100

Two online reviews tag the professor as a , and the only reported grade is a B.

Format shift

Strict grading evidence comes mainly from online reviews, while the slow grading.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students say the work is okay or not hard, but lecture heaviness and participation requirements add friction.

Format shift

Online reviews describe manageable work with more required structure, while the workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students repeatedly describe pointless lectures, disorganization, rude communication, and careless behavior.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize rude communication, while the and disorganization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention assignments, participation, and , but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and participation, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person , but the class felt pointless and .

Main concern

The student says the lectures were pointless and the .

What students said

“Her lectures are pointless, I couldnt tell you one thing I learned from her class.”
COMS18
“ !!”
COMS18

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe the work as manageable but , and tough grading.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“The work wasn"t hard, she took and obnoxious on emails.”
COMMD0001
“The work itself is okay, just like any other comm class.”
COMMD001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , in-person exams, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Her lectures are pointless, I couldnt tell you one thing I learned from her class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

3/100

“ ”

⚖️

20/100

“The work wasn"t hard, she took and obnoxious on emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are pointless, I couldnt tell you one thing I learned from her class.
  • !!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work wasn"t hard, she took and obnoxious on emails.
  • The work itself is okay, just like any other comm class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Treated us like children and made sure we knew she had a busy life outside of school.
  • Most careless prof I've had.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three older reviews, but they are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COMMD00011 review
COMMD0011 review
COMS181 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values