AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Elena Dorabji

POLY1 · POLITICALSCI · POLISCI · POLISCI001 · POLI1 · HIST101 · POLICOMP · POLS2 · PLSCI1 · POLISCI1 · POLI001 · POLS001 · POLI01 · POLSC001 · POLS1 · POLI2 · PSCI1 · POLSCI1 · POLS01 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle long opinionated lectures and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery OpinionatedLong LecturesPolarizing TeachingUnclear TestsHard Grading Risk
  • some find her passionate and knowledgeable, while many find her biased and condescending.
  • A major complaint is that exams and and reading expectations.
  • The course can be manageable for and align with her expectations, but it is risky for GPA-focused students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students say an A is possible by taking notes and writing what she expects, but many warn that grading and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not always intellectually hard, but long lectures, tangents, and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it shows mixed difficulty depending on tolerance for lecture-heavy teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

because tests and quizzes rely heavily on what she says in lecture.

and lecture dependence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because many students report , and harsh or .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students frequently describe tough, subjective grading where disagreement or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload , and heavy lecture-note dependence.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She is often described as knowledgeable and passionate, but many students find the lectures biased, rambling, and hard to use for exams.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and take-home components depending on the course.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

passion and knowledge but frequent complaints about bias, lectures, and grading.

Main concern

Tests and if students disagree with her views or miss lecture details.

What students said

“Its extremely frustrating.”
POLI001
“For the .”
POLSCI1
“Strong personality. KNOWS HER STUFF.”
POLISCI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe mixed exam formats, with some take-home or easy elements but .

Multiple Choice TestsTake-Home Midterm MentionedHard FinalLecture-Based QuizzesSubjective Questions

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and hard finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Take-Home Midterm MentionedHard FinalLecture-Based Quizzes
“ and so bad.”
POLISCI1
“A .”
POLI1
“the quizzes and .”
POLI001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Strong personality. KNOWS HER STUFF.”

⚖️

25/100

“the way she grades and asks questions is not fair”

⚠️

42/100

“the quizzes and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gets straight to the point.
  • She talks for the entire class off the top of her head randomly goin on tangents.
  • She is very opinionated.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • For the .
  • if you want a A
  • good in the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Fit

  • This class is not for the faint of heart; it changed my pov on our country 180.
  • If you disagree it'll be bad.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is high, but many reviews are old and politically polarized, so the signal is useful but noisy.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 510
3 out of 515
2 out of 515
1 out of 59

Course coverage

POLI116 reviews
POLISCI18 reviews
POLI0015 reviews
POLI013 reviews
POLI23 reviews
Show 14 more courses
POLISCI2 reviews
HIST1011 review
PLSCI11 review
POLICOMP1 review
POLISCI0011 review
POLITICALSCI1 review
POLS0011 review
POLS011 review
POLS11 review
POLS21 review
POLSC0011 review
POLSCI11 review
POLY11 review
PSCI11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No_Grade 1