AI Rate Professor

English

Anthony Delaney

EWRT200 · ENG1A · EWRT1B · ELIT22 · AA · EWRT100 · EWRT2 · EWRT22 · EWRT002 · EWRT1C · BIBLEELIT · MYTH22 · EWRIT1A · EWRTSECT · EWRT211 · EWRT2A · EWRT1A · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and can tolerate strict grading and strong course themes.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough Essay GraderHeavy WritingPolitical ThemesMixed FeedbackInteresting Discussions
  • Student opinion is and .
  • Many reviews warn , and .
  • The course can reward serious writers but is risky for students seeking an easy or predictable English class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn A grades, but the comments repeatedly say essays, reading, and .

Online reviews sound especially workload-heavy, while in-person reviews add both easy-pass comments and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is not always technically hard, but the , and .

Online evidence emphasizes assignments and papers, while and grading unpredictability.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory or say skipping class hurts performance.

as required, with in-person reviews most clearly warning that skipping class hurts.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is mixed because students like his insight and discussions but often dislike the , and narrow course focus.

Online reviews are mixed but often negative about workload, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many reviews call him a tough or and complain that .

Format shift

Both online and especially negative about papers.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of , and community projects.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly emphasize heavy assignments, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He can be engaging and insightful, but many students say themes.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed but somewhat less detailed, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears centered on , and some quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to writing assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and insight while criticizing hard grading, political focus, and limited writing instruction.

Main concern

Students who want neutral topics or .

What students said

“ .”
EWRT1B
“He has this really cool vibe and the class is focused on areas of racism, society, which makes an english class very intresting.”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews lean workload-heavy, with , and community projects.

Main concern

Online students often report too much writing and .

What students said

“LOTS of so get ready to write.”
EWRT2
“One of the hardest classes ever! !”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe papers, projects, and quizzes, and they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Writing-Heavy AssessmentOnline QuizzesCommunity Service ProjectReading Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and projects, but do not clearly prove a standard exam policy.

Reading QuizzesMany EssaysFinal Project
“Expects you to read a lot and .”
EWRT1C
“Also, there's also a and present it.”
EWRT1B

Online

Online reviews mention papers, assignments, and a five-question quiz, but .

Many PapersCommunity Service ProjectOnline Quiz
“just twice a week you do a little reading and .”
BIBLEELIT
“a .”
EWRT2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If well!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching polarization, grading risk, workload, and format differences; credibility rating: High.

⚖️

25/100

“Legit, a .”

📚 Workload Load

24/100

“LOTS of so get ready to write.”

🎯 Teaching Split

58/100

“He has this really cool vibe and the class is focused on areas of racism, society, which makes an english class very intresting.”

Theme 1

✍️ About Writing And Grades

  • .
  • If well!
  • He grades unbelievably hard.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS of so get ready to write.
  • There is a lot of work in the beginning and then you coast through the rest of the quarter.
  • You have a discussion and a few activities due every week.

Theme 3

💬 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting topics and discussions.
  • . Can't get to the point.
  • He really helps students to think critically.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years provide broad evidence, though older reviews and polarized opinions lower certainty slightly.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 514
3 out of 59
2 out of 58
1 out of 59

Course coverage

EWRT1B11 reviews
EWRT1A9 reviews
EWRT28 reviews
EWRT2115 reviews
EWRIT1A3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
EWRT0022 reviews
EWRT2A2 reviews
AA1 review
BIBLEELIT1 review
ELIT221 review
ENG1A1 review
EWRT1001 review
EWRT1C1 review
EWRT2001 review
EWRT221 review
EWRTSECT1 review
MYTH221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1