AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Political Science

Tom Meredith

POLI5 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you can handle a writing-heavy online course and care more about structure than ease.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWriting heavyWell organizedResponsive by emailGood feedbackHard-earned A
  • The only review reports a and responsiveness.
  • The A+ , and discussions.
  • Recommendation confidence is low because there is only one review and the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A+ is possible, but the student clearly had to , and frequent papers.

All evidence comes from one online review, and there is no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course is intellectually and practically demanding because , and analysis.

Only online evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Attendance is not clearly described, and the online format .

Only one online review exists and it .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The student respected the organization and feedback but still .

The recommendation signal comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

The student earned an A+ and mentions , but the grade required substantial effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly quizzes, discussion posts, replies, and .

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The , and course interest despite the heavy workload.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and papers rather than midterm or final exams.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and responsive but , and frequent papers.

Main concern

The workload is heavy even for a student who earned an A+.

What students said

“Def had to work for this grade but very interesting and .”
POLI5
“1 paper almost every week (comparative analyses, summaries) A lot of writing involved here.”
POLI5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course has and instead uses weekly quizzes, discussions, and open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesNo MidtermNo FinalDiscussion PostsFrequent Papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence shows weekly quizzes and webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesNo MidtermNo Final
“Weekly 3 try quiz and discussion post w/ 2 replies. .”
POLI5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Def had to work for this grade but very interesting and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, so the result highlights direct evidence but keeps confidence low. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Def had to work for this grade but very interesting and .”

📝 Workload

22/100

“1 paper almost every week (comparative analyses, summaries) A lot of writing involved here.”

📬 Support

78/100

“ if you have any questions :)”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload

  • Weekly 3 try quiz and discussion post w/ 2 replies.
  • 1 paper almost every week (comparative analyses, summaries) A lot of writing involved here.

Theme 2

🎯 About Teaching Support

  • if you have any questions :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

There is only one review, so the details are useful but not enough for a stable professor-wide judgment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLI51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values