AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Martina Ebesugawa

CD68CD52 · CHILD10H · PSYC14 · CD68 · CD51A · CD58 · CD10H · CD12 · CD52 · CD10G · CDH · CDHCDH · ECE125 · CD10 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you value a knowledgeable and caring professor, but if you need tight organization and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableCaringUnorganizedHeavy WorkloadOpen-Note Tests
  • Students often praise her knowledge, care, and real-world experience.
  • A repeated concern is organization, fast lectures, canceled classes, and .
  • Grades can be fair or generous if students keep up with , and assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

, and submit work, but several classes require real effort.

Online reviews are more positive about support, while and heavier effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The subject is manageable, but fast lectures, theory, and .

Online students describe support and structure, while and fast pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, while many older reviews do not clearly state a policy.

, and in-person evidence ranges from mandatory to unclear.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and support, but organization problems create real hesitation.

Online reviews are strongly recommended, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Several students earned A grades and one review says she grades on effort and wants to give A's.

Format shift

Online comments mention chances to raise grades, while and high expectations.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and summer workload that can feel heavy.

Format shift

Online workload is less clearly negative, while in-person reviews contain the strongest heavy-workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often praised as knowledgeable and caring, but .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

47/100

Comments mention , and open-note exams.

Format shift

Online assessment details are limited, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

knowledge and care but repeated complaints about disorganization and fast lectures.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear organization, fast pacing, and .

What students said

“ !”
CD10G
“she lectured so fast students couldn't keep up”
CD58
“She grades on effort,less on content.She wants to give A's.”
CD10G

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive and , and chances to improve grades.

Main concern

Online comments still stress participation, notes, and steady engagement.

What students said

“she posts so you can follow along and also write side notes.”
ECE125
“she provided thorough guidance and .”
CD51A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but the overall exam policy is not fully documented.

Open-Note TestsUseful NotesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book exams.

Open-Note TestsUseful Notes
“She provides lots of useful notes for .”
CD10G
“She has great knowledge and experience in early childhood development and the lectures were very interesting.She provides lots of useful notes for .”
CD10G

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and helpful. I took her 8:30 class , she emails at 8:30 and cancels the class. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Dr Ebesugawa was a terrific professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

66/100

“ !”

⚠️ Organization Risk

42/100

“Dr. Ebesugawa is a nice teacher but !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Ebesugawa is extensive in knowledge and field experience, she is very willing to answer questions, direct resources and help students succeed.
  • She has great knowledge and experience in early childhood development and the lectures were interesting and supplemented with her experiences.
  • Very Passionate teacher, But I .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Pacing

  • and to spend ample time on your work.
  • There was a lot of work for summer but she was really flexible and willing to work with me because I made an effort to communicate with her.
  • She .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades and Exams

  • She gives students chances to raise their grade!
  • She grades on effort,less on content.She wants to give A's.
  • She provides lots of useful notes for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews cover many years and provide detailed, repeated patterns despite some older data.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD10G10 reviews
CD10H5 reviews
CD523 reviews
CD102 reviews
CD122 reviews
Show 9 more courses
CD582 reviews
CD51A1 review
CD681 review
CD68CD521 review
CDH1 review
CDHCDH1 review
CHILD10H1 review
ECE1251 review
PSYC141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1