AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Philosophy

Emily Gable

WMST49 · DO4901 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a caring professor and a very realistic A+ path, but expect lecture-heavy classes.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaringEasy A+Student Feedback FocusedLecture HeavyDry Lectures
  • Students describe her as caring, passionate, and .
  • The grade outcome looks extremely easy, with both analyzed reviews reporting A+ grades.
  • The main drawback is that lectures may feel dry or boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Both reviews report A+ grades, and one student says full scores were possible despite procrastinating and barely doing the readings.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course experience sounds intellectually light, though participation and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and participation mattered, while the other did not provide an .

Only in-person reviews are available, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Both students would take her again because she is caring and the .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

because both students earned A+ and one says coherent, on-topic writing led to an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Readings are mentioned, but one student says they barely did them and still earned full scores.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students praise her care and passion, but one review calls the lectures dry and boring.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention participation, writing, group projects, and test-heavy tags without enough .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are very positive and path.

Main concern

Lectures can feel dry and boring.

What students said

“She is genuinely passionate about the subject, and she really cares about her students.”
WMST49
“This is one of the easiest A+ I have ever gotten.”
DO4901

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or testing format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is one of the easiest A+ I have ever gotten.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She is genuinely passionate about the subject, and she really cares about her students.”

📈 Easy A Path

96/100

“I procrastinated but I got full scores on everything.”

⚠️ Lecture Experience

62/100

“Lectures are very dry and boring.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is genuinely passionate about the subject, and she really cares about her students.
  • Gable asks for and makes sure that she is able to provide the best learning experience possible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is one of the easiest A+ I have ever gotten.
  • As long as you are coherent, concise, and stay on topic in your writing: A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though they are consistent and detailed enough for a cautious read.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DO49011 review
WMST491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values