AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Janet Gawbill

MATH212 · MATH · MATH105 · MATHMATH · MATH112 · MATH101 · MATH14 · MATH41 · MATH114 · MATH51 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can handle a strict, fast-paced math class and learn well from worksheets and structured practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear handoutsFast-paced lecturesStrict classroom styleHomework-drivenPolarizing personality
  • Most older , and test preparation.
  • Recent reviews are much harsher about attitude, speed, and lack of .
  • Grades can be very manageable if students attend, keep up with worksheets, and prepare from assigned work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic if students attend, keep up with worksheets, and use review materials, but it is not effortless.

All grade and because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The math content is often described as manageable, but the pace and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory or say skipping class makes passing difficult.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and , but many warn about her harsh tone and fast lectures.

The recommendation and is more negative in recent comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

She offers helpful grading supports such as , and review sheets, though some recent reviews call her tough.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload includes frequent homework, worksheets, quizzes, and tests, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

67/100

Her teaching is organized and clear for many students, but , and condescending behavior.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, with older reviews much more positive than recent reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Assessment appears centered on quizzes, tests, and a and worksheets.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence comes from in-person classes, where students describe a structured but strict math instructor with sharply mixed reactions.

Main concern

Students who need a and tone.

What students said

“ and clear.”
MATH212
“She goes really fast.”
MATH112
“She has a very condescending attitude and blames her students for not knowing the answer to everything.”
MATH41

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent but student-friendly in parts because reviews mention note sheets, review materials, and dropped assessments.

One-page notes allowedReview sheets before examsFrequent quizzesDropped test or quizMultiple-choice final

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support note sheets, review sheets, frequent quizzes, and some dropped assessments, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

One-page notes allowedReview sheets before examsFrequent quizzesDropped test or quizMultiple-choice final
“ ”
MATH212
“Lets you drop one test out of 3.”
MATH114
“ .”
MATH114

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if your willing to learn because she goes by quick.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“She is wonderful at explaining things.”

⚖️

68/100

“ and allows you to have one sheet of notes for tests.”

📌 Workload And Pace

45/100

“Keeping up with .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

55/100

“I highly reccomend taking her!! She seems really mean, but she knows how to teach math very well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has very clear handouts for every section , very eager to help in class goes over everything very clearly.
  • She lectures, but .
  • Ms. Gawbill attempts to teach math through rote memorization as opposed to actually showing students the concepts behind it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Very easy class to pass if your keeping up with your studies, and .
  • , but essential for passing the .
  • Miss Gawbill also provides , she is a great professor.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Personality And Classroom Fit

  • She may seem "mean" but shes not thats just the way she talks.
  • Condescending and abrupt.
  • She is very discouraging and will not help you very much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 46 in-person reviews across many years, with detailed comments but a strong time-based split between older praise and recent criticism.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 510
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH21217 reviews
MATH11413 reviews
MATH1056 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
MATH412 reviews
Show 6 more courses
20041 review
MATH1 review
MATH1011 review
MATH141 review
MATH511 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3