AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Rick Hubbard

64E · CIS64F · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you can learn independently and only need to complete the requirement.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teaching valueSelf-taught courseUnclear gradingHeavy online workload
  • Most reviews strongly warn against taking him, especially online.
  • Students describe weak teaching, vague or outsourced course material, and poor course value.
  • A and help outside class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some students got A or called the class easy, but , and dropped students keep it from being a true easy A.

Online evidence includes easy grades but worse self-study risk, while and mostly negative tone.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The material is often described as basic, but poor explanations and the content itself.

Online reviews emphasize basic concepts and self-study, while and wasted class time.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, but one online review and as mandatory.

Both online and few mandatory exceptions.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

because they feel the teaching is weak and the course is not worth the money.

Online , while in-person reviews include one positive exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Reviews mention penalties, missing rubrics, and a though some students still earned A or B grades.

Format shift

Online grading complaints are stronger, while and one fair-test comment.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Online reviews mention lots of homework, required outside course material, and .

Format shift

Online workload is the main concern, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Seven of eight reviews rate him very poorly and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly negative, while very negative ones.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention both assignments and exams, but do not give enough detail to show one method dominates.

Format shift

Online comments mention exams and assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative, with one and .

Main concern

Students report poor lectures and low course value.

What students said

“Run as far and as fast as you can before enrolling in his classes”
CIS64F
“Lecture notes were extremely verbose and full of crap”
CIS64F
“Rick takes the and outside.”
64E

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, saying the course , and .

Main concern

Students feel they learn little and are left on their own.

What students said

“Terrible, his teaching is online office hours”
CIS64F
“You are entirely on your own”
CIS64F
“ .”
64E

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and assignments, but they .

Assignments And ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Limited Exam Evidence
“He just tested I was fairly.”
64E

Online

Online reviews mention exams and assignments, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Assignments And ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“graded on in exams/assignments”
CIS64F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run as far and as fast as you can before enrolling in his classes, he is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, separating online and in-person evidence while , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

14/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“You are entirely on your own, just read wikipedia articles and you will learn more.”

⚖️

32/100

“Penalizes students for not meeting criteria/rubric-pts on assignments, which he's unwilling to provide.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terrible, his teaching is online office hours
  • what was he teaching???
  • Rick takes the and outside.

Theme 2

💸 About Course Value

  • .
  • Easy class, you won't learn anything, save your time and money
  • many other useful courses in other colleges or at De Anza itself.

Theme 3

📚 About Work And Materials

  • Lectures/modules are just basic concepts.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • advanced math that no one understands

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews across online and with one clear positive exception.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CIS64F6 reviews
64E2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values