AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Roberta Bloom

MATH1C · CAL1C · CALC1B · D011 · MATH1A · PRECA02 · MATH10STATISTI · MATHD011 · MATH43 · MATH11 · MATH10 · MATH12 · CALC1C · 156 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want structure and can keep up with , and exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganized but demandingTest heavyLots of homeworkClear notesMixed student experience
  • Students often praise her organization, notes, and willingness to help.
  • , and exam preparation.
  • The biggest complaints are heavy , and long exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say , and prepare for frequent quizzes and exams.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The content is math-heavy, often fast-paced, and much harder in some courses than in MATH10.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory or say skipping class makes passing unlikely.

, and there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and help, but many warn that the workload and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

as tough, though , and note sheets sometimes soften the impact.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and multiple exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

She is often clear, organized, and helpful, but .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and homework, with several reviews calling the class test heavy.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but demanding math instructor whose value depends heavily on the course and student preparation.

Main concern

The main risk is heavy workload with long or difficult exams.

What students said

“Professor Bloom is a good teacher. and .”
MATH1C
“Heavy workload for a working student.”
MATH12
“ .”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and sometimes long, but several reviews say notes or cheat sheets are allowed.

Frequent QuizzesMultiple ExamsCumulative FinalNote Sheets AllowedLong Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and limited notes allowed on some tests.

Frequent QuizzesMultiple ExamsCumulative FinalNote Sheets AllowedLong Exams
“ but will drop your lowest grade 3-4 tests plus 1 finals.”
MATH10
“Plus, she allows 1pg of handwritten notes for .”
MATH10
“Never enough time for her exams, 75% of students were still there after class was over.”
MATH12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Bloom is a good teacher. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“ . Everything you do in a quarter is laid out, she uses guided notes, and the tests/quizzes are representative of the material in the homework.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Heavy workload for a working student.”

⚖️

45/100

“You really have to work for your grade in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • .
  • Lectures is a sprint so you wont retain much.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You really have to work for your grade in her class.
  • .
  • Quizzes and .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • so practice a lot!
  • and she allows cheat sheets!
  • The and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

156

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 detailed in-person reviews over many years, though some reviews are old and course outcomes vary.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 535
3 out of 526
2 out of 528
1 out of 522

Course coverage

MATH1017 reviews
MATH439 reviews
MATH1C6 reviews
MATH114 reviews
MATH124 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1A3 reviews
CAL1C1 review
CALC1B1 review
CALC1C1 review
D0111 review
MATH10STATISTI1 review
MATHD0111 review
PRECA021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

4

B 4

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values