AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development Education

Zana Wilkie

CD10G · CD50 · CD71 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her only if , and inconsistent teaching for a possible decent grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkMixed GradingCaring But DisorganizedMandatory AttendanceExtra Credit
  • Most , and unfair grading.
  • Some students still report easy grades because of , late-work acceptance, and simple assignments.
  • All analyzed evidence is from in-person classes, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic for organized students because she offers and accepts late work, but the workload can still be large.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Some assignments are described as easy, but the class can feel harder because of and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show easier CD10G experiences but much rougher CD71 experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

reviews.

Only in-person reviews exist, and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students would not retake her because , and unfair grading.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

because some students call her easy and generous while others call her unfair or tough.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with and unfair-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple students describe lots of homework, frequent reading, journals, chapters, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive comments mention caring and clarity, but more detailed negative reviews describe boring lectures, poor preparation, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and test-heavy structure, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the assessment evidence comes from homework-heavy and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but the dominant concern is heavy work with .

Main concern

Students , and unfair grading.

What students said

“Professor Wilkie gives a load of home work that you cant even finish in one or two days.”
CD71
“Gives a lot of assignment but is not strict on getting it in on time.”
CD10G
“very good professor. The discussions and and .”
CD10G

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring policyTest HeavyPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove the exact exam format or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesExam policy not clearly proven
“TEST HEAVY”
CD10G
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
CD71

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She just read from the slides and give so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She doesnt come prepared at times & was unsure on certain topics.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Professor Wilkie gives a load of home work that you cant even finish in one or two days.”

📈 Grade Potential

76/100

“Gives ton of and accepts late work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super boring lectures.
  • She doesn't know how to teach this class.
  • Wonderful teacher who is very approachable and takes the extra time and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She just read from the slides and give so .
  • She gives 5 chapters every day and two journals for home work.
  • The discussions and and .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Also gives a lot of opportunities for .
  • I felt very bad with how unfairly she grades her student.
  • Just get all your assigned work done and you will get a good grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews give useful detail, but many are old and opinions are strongly split across courses.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CD10G5 reviews
CD713 reviews
CD501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 2