AI Rate Professor

History

Crystal Hupp

HIST53X · USHIST17 · HIST51 · HIST17C · HIST17ASJCC · HISTORY17C · 53X · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and can tolerate unclear expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard GraderLecture HeavyStrict AttendanceConfusing ExamsPolarizing Teaching
  • Many students describe her as .
  • A few students value her deep, discussion-based teaching style.
  • Grades can be possible, but the experience is often frustrating and unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A good grade is possible, but , and unclear expectations make the A costly.

Both formats lean difficult, but the online evidence is only one negative review and the in-person evidence is broader.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels harder because students describe confusing , and strict expectations.

In-person reviews provide most difficulty evidence, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as strict.

Both the single online review and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

Most students do not recommend her because they find the .

The online review is negative, and the in-person reviews are mixed but mostly cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and complain that expectations and .

Format shift

the online review also tagged Tough Grader.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Reviews mention , and a final.

Format shift

In-person reviews give most workload detail, while the .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students praise her passion, but many describe her as .

Format shift

The online review is very negative, while positive detail.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and assignments.

Format shift

and exams; the online review mentions confusing assignments but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

fans but many complaints about strict grading, boring lectures, and .

Main concern

and a harsh classroom tone.

What students said

“ .”
HIST17C
“If you want .”
HIST17C
“ , and a .”
USHIST17

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and .

Main concern

The online class is described as , and poorly taught.

What students said

“ .”
USHIST17
“ .”
USHIST17

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essay-based assessment, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Confusing ExamsEssay Midterm And FinalPapersQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and essay questions, but not proctoring or book rules.

Confusing ExamsWeekly QuizzesEssay MidtermEssay Final
“ and half of the questions she never covered in class.”
HIST17C
“1 Midterm and : answer 2 essay questions.”
HIST17ASJCC
“Each week there is a quiz and a .”
HIST17ASJCC

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I found her to be super boring,strict (not in a and negative.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She doesn't teach what the class is about.”

⚖️

18/100

“She is a and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

31/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She taught in a style commensurate with Socratic dialogues.
  • The class was boring and I think that the rank written in 2013 was written by her or a friend.
  • She is strict but fair; incredibly lively & passionate about her subject matter.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • and .
  • It was very lecture heavy.
  • Each week there is a quiz and a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Her way seemed really condescending.
  • It felt like she had a negative approach to students.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 15 reviews with detailed but older and , so patterns are useful but not fully current.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST17C5 reviews
USHIST174 reviews
53X2 reviews
HIST17ASJCC1 review
HIST511 review
Show 2 more courses
HIST53X1 review
HISTORY17C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1