AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Kanako Suda

ESL263 · LRNA96 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle a highly inconsistent experience across sections and terms.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teaching qualityEasy grades possibleTough grading complaintsHelpful feedbackLecture heavy
  • Reviews are and very poor teaching.
  • Several students report easy A outcomes, but and .
  • All analyzed evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online review evidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

An A can be easy in some sections, but tough-grader and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Some students call the work light and easy, but others describe weak teaching and lecture-heavy classes that make the course harder.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and warns that skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students are split between strong praise for help and feedback and strong warnings about poor teaching and grading.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students earned easy A grades, but several comments call her a little guidance.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and no tests, while and test-heavy work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and claims that she does not teach well.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, but the assessment mix appears inconsistent by class.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with and easy grades while others report poor teaching and .

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent teaching quality and .

What students said

“ . .”
LRNA96
“She doesn't teach well. The .”
LRNA96
“Getting A is easy, but take 263 with her is not good for taking 273 in the future.”
ESL263

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence conflicts, with one student reporting no tests and .

No TestTest HeavyTests Different From Assigned Work

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove one stable exam policy.

No TestTest HeavyTests Different From Assigned Work
“ .”
LRNA96
“The .”
LRNA96

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She doesn't teach well. The .”

📈 Grade Effort

67/100

“Getting A is easy, but take 263 with her is not good for taking 273 in the future.”

⚖️

45/100

“ to teach.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has clear instructions and .
  • She doesn't teach well.
  • so , so that you will understand fully.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Getting A is easy, but take 263 with her is not good for taking 273 in the future.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews over several years give useful evidence, but the comments are polarized and mostly old.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESL2635 reviews
LRNA963 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values