AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lance Lund

1B · ENGR215 · MATH11 · MATH1B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if and manageable exams, but expect and outside explanations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOpen-Book ExamsLots of HomeworkLenient GradingWeak LecturesAttendance Matters
  • Grades can be very manageable because and .
  • Lecture quality is inconsistent, with several students saying he is quiet, unclear, or .
  • The workload is heavier than the difficulty suggests because and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Getting an A looks realistic if you keep up with homework because and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The math courses are often described as easy, but engineering content can feel .

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as required or warn that skipping class makes passing difficult.

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and easy exams, not for strong lectures.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students mention partial , and grade-heavy homework structures.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many comments mention lots of homework as a major grade driver.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

He can be helpful and cover fundamentals, but multiple students call him a poor or quiet lecturer.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final rather than relying on only one assessment type.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but mixed teaching quality and .

Main concern

Weak lectures may force students .

What students said

“By far one of the easiest math classes I have ever taken.”
MATH11
“He's pretty chill and helps out if you ask.”
ENGR215
“Lund is a poor lecturer.”
1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam evidence is student-friendly because comments mention , and easy tests.

Open BookOpen NoteTake-Home QuizzesEasy TestsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and take-home quizzes, while no strict proctoring evidence appears.

Open BookOpen NoteTake-Home QuizzesPartial Credit
“Everything is open book and many of .”
MATH11
“He allows you to use your textbook for all exams and everything is open note.”
MATH11
“His midterms and for math in college since it was open notes.”
MATH1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a super fair grader and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Lund is a poor lecturer.”

📈 Grade Value

85/100

“If you ace all the homework and .”

⚖️

82/100

“He gives partial credit as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrendous teacher the student must learn complex engineering methods all by themselves because he is such a poor lecturer.
  • Lectures really quietly though.
  • He skips steps in his reasoning and speaks quietly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • By far one of the easiest math classes I have ever taken.
  • If you have a somewhat strong background in algebra 2 or precalculus, this class will be a breeze for you.
  • If you .

Theme 3

📝

  • Online HW for every section and uses Wiley Plus which I found to be an awful platform.
  • There is quite a bit of online HW to, so be sure to be on top of it.
  • Everything is open book and many of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has six in-person reviews across several years with but mixed detail and no recent or online evidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR2152 reviews
MATH112 reviews
1B1 review
MATH1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values