AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Physics

Gunjan Chakravarty

PHYS10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

unless you can tolerate dull lectures and learn mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesMandatory AttendanceParticipation Required
  • The only review strongly criticizes the teaching quality.
  • and skipping class is risky.
  • The course difficulty is low, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The course is rated low difficulty, but there is and , so an A is not proven to be easy.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The content sounds basic and definition-heavy, but poor teaching may make it feel worse.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and the tag warns that skipping class can make students fail.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The because the lectures were boring and ineffective.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The review , but attendance and participation matter.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The only review directly says she is boring and not a good teacher.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and not well taught.

Main concern

The main concern is weak teaching despite low course difficulty.

What students said

“Very boring professor.”
PHYS10
“I just think she is not a good teacher.”
PHYS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or requirements.

Exam Policy Not Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very boring professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I just think she is not a good teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“Very boring professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very boring professor.
  • She lectures us like we are in in preschool and basically like repeating definitions and textbook definition for the whole lecture...

Theme 2

📌

  • Yes
  • ? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the result is weak even though the comment is direct.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHYS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values