AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Intercultural Studies

Edmundo Norte

ICS80X · ICS81X · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you value reflection and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPersonal Growth FocusDisorganized StructureParticipation BasedPolarizing Experience
  • Reviews are sharply split between a transformative cohort experience and a frustrating lack of structure.
  • The class appears intellectually easy but depends on comfort with discussion and ambiguity.
  • Students who need clear directions may struggle despite the low difficulty rating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The difficulty ratings are very low, but only one review reports an A and the class may require participation.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students rate the class as very low difficulty, and the content seems more reflective than technically demanding.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory, and participation appears central to the class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student accepts loose structure and nontraditional learning goals.

All , and the two reviews directly conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Low difficulty and one reported A , but the evidence is limited.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

Reviews , and both difficulty ratings are very low.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student found the class meaningful, while another found the and painful.

Format shift

Teaching and is highly mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments emphasize participation and growth rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

growth and criticism of poor structure.

Main concern

The and weak organization.

What students said

“Yes but it is all about emotional intelligence and mental growth.”
ICS81X
“the structure of the class is really bad for people who need directions and expectations laid out from the beginning.”
ICS80X

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the structure of the class is really bad for people who need directions and expectations laid out from the beginning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Yes but it is all about emotional intelligence and mental growth.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

50/100

“I would say this class is beyond your imagination and and join the cohort.”

⚠️ Structure Risk

35/100

“he does not follow through at all and is just generally a pain”

Theme 1

🧭 About Structure

  • Yes but it is all about emotional intelligence and mental growth.
  • the structure of the class is really bad for people who need directions and expectations laid out from the beginning.

Theme 2

💬 About Class Fit

  • You are not supposed to judge this class by traditional measures.
  • he talks too much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly disagree, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ICS80X1 review
ICS81X1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values