AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Mathematics amp Statistics

Jonathan Nay

MATH43 · MATH1C · MATH1A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can handle steady homework and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient gradingHeavy homeworkHard timed examsHelpful office hoursInconsistent lectures
  • Students often say grading is lenient and .
  • The , and sometimes hard 50-minute exams.
  • some praise his clarity and care, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Grades can be forgiving because exams and , but homework and .

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The math content is challenging, and several students .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others .

, and the policy varies by course or section.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and help, but warn that lecture quality and workload are uneven.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Multiple students say exams, quizzes, and partial credit are graded very generously.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

and is described as weekly, difficult, or excessive.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is often described as nice and accessible, but many students say lectures are not strong enough.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize tests, quizzes, pop quizzes, review sessions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and show a polarizing class with heavy workload but .

Main concern

Students and exams that can feel too long or hard.

What students said

“He's very, very lenient and tests”
MATH1C
“ ”
MATH1C
“effort required, but straightforward.”
MATH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be hard and time-limited, but reviews also mention review material and ; no book or proctoring policy is clearly proven.

Timed ExamsPop QuizzesReview MaterialPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes with some hard timing, review material, and generous partial credit.

Timed ExamsPop QuizzesReview MaterialPartial Credit
“ and long though you have 50 minutes.”
MATH1C
“ and gives review material the day before the exam”
MATH1C
“He is very clear about what's going to be on the test.”
MATH43

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you care more about .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

82/100

“He's very, very lenient and tests”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“Same amount of in one week.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He's not that great at lecturing, so keep that in mind when selecting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Nay is passionate about his subject and approachable and .
  • Not good lecturer.
  • He teaches concepts well, and doesn't rush through topics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you care more about .
  • effort required, but straightforward.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Homework

  • and long though you have 50 minutes.
  • Only real criticisms are the amount and difficulty of the .
  • The and the review

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 12 in-person reviews are detailed and recent to the teaching period but strongly split by course experience.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1C7 reviews
MATH434 reviews
MATH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1