AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Martinelli Mark

ACCOUNTING1A · ACOUNTING1A · ACCOUNTING1C · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you want structured accounting practice and can handle heavy work, but if you need an easy or low-time class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHard ExamsLots of HomeworkKnowledgeableFair With PreparationAttendance Matters
  • Students often recommend him because he is knowledgeable and .
  • The course , and .
  • A good grade is possible, but students must attend, study hard, and stay current.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are possible, but students describe lots of , and the need to study seriously.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Accounting concepts may be learnable, but the , and comprehensive problems make the course challenging.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews with for passing.

review saying attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

because he is knowledgeable and fair when students prepare.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students mention and fair exams, but others call him a tough or .

Format shift

and is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and long quizzes.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, and .

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

He is often described as knowledgeable and prepared, but .

Format shift

Teaching and is mixed but more positive in later reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Assessment , and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a demanding accounting class with , and .

Main concern

The workload and assessments can feel too hard or time-consuming.

What students said

; .
ACOUNTING1A
Gave alot of homework but .
ACCOUNTING1A
and quizz. Expect too high.
ACCOUNTING1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are demanding but sometimes supported by study guides and .

Fair ExamsStudy GuidesHard MidtermOnline Open-Book QuizzesComprehensive Problems

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention fair exams with study guides, hard midterms, and online open-book quizzes, but .

Fair ExamsStudy GuidesHard MidtermOnline Open-Book QuizzesComprehensive Problems
; .
ACOUNTING1A
and done on line open book.
ACCOUNTING1A
. Comprehensive problems.
ACCOUNTING1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Gave alot of homework but .

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

Very knowledgeable and .

📚 Workload

28/100

Although he is very knowledgable, most of the help and .

📝

48/100

hard.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Instructor well prepared. Very knowledgeable and .
  • Knowledgeable professor; .
  • He is a very hard grade and doesn't teach well.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of .
  • Gave alot of homework but .
  • A lot of home work and every week quizzes helped me better learned accounting principles.

Theme 3

📝

  • ; .
  • hard.
  • and quizz. Expect too high.
  • The quiz take 4 hours to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 detailed reviews with consistent workload signals, but opinions on teaching quality are mixed.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCOUNTING1A9 reviews
ACOUNTING1A2 reviews
ACCOUNTING1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values