AI Rate Professor

Health Technology

Patricia Williams

HTEC910 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and studying heavily.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-TaughtTest HeavyHeavy ReadingMandatory AttendanceMissed Lectures
  • The student earned an A but described the class as very difficult and study-heavy.
  • Teaching support appears weak because the student felt the course was mostly self-taught.
  • Attendance and reading are necessary, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but the comment makes it clear that , and studying.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course is described as math-like, very difficult, and study-heavy.

Only in-person evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

, and the student says going to class is needed to do the homework.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The student would not take her again because the .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The student earned an A, but the comment points to hard .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The , and repeated studying.

Format shift

Only the in-person review mentions workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

The student felt the class was mostly self-taught and noted that she missed several lectures.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The tags and and homework support work.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes a very difficult, test-heavy class that , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to compensate for missed lectures and weak instructional support.

What students said

“Although I got an A, I felt like it was more self taught.”
HTEC910
“Either way, study study study”
HTEC910

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review clearly says the class is test-heavy, but it does not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove closed-book, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Test Heavy
“ ? You won't pass., Test heavy”
HTEC910

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although I got an A, I felt like it was more self taught.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Although I got an A, I felt like it was more self taught.”

⚠️ Difficulty

15/100

“This class is basically like math.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Either way, study study study”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Although I got an A, I felt like it was more self taught.
  • Maybe it was because she missed like 4 lectures with us?

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is basically like math.
  • You need to go to class and read to do the hw.
  • Either way, study study study

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • ? You won't pass., Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

The review has useful detail but comes from only 1 older in-person review.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HTEC9101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values