AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English As A Second Language

Mary Goowin

ESLDA12 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if , and limited review evidence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyAttendance mattersMixed teaching reviews
  • , and they strongly conflict.
  • One review reports very high difficulty and .
  • The limited comments mention both test pressure and easy teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The only reported grade is a B- from a review that rated difficulty 5 and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content looks inconsistent because one student called it easy while another rated it very difficult and .

Only in-person comments exist, and they conflict sharply.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and warns that skipping class can hurt passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Recommendation evidence is weak but negative because the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The B- grade and , but evidence is very thin.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The test-heavy tag and difficulty 5 rating suggest a heavier workload or assessment burden.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Teaching feedback is split between a quality 1 review and a quality 5 review with .

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The .

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and split between one harsh review and one positive easy-course comment.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent evidence with .

What students said

“her Esl 251 is amazing”
ESLDA12
“good teacher, easy”
ESLDA12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test-heavy pressure but do not .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
ESLDA12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“good teacher, easy”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting limited and conflicting teaching, difficulty, and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“good teacher, easy”

⚠️ Difficulty Risk

35/100

“her Esl 251 is amazing”

🧾 Test Pressure

45/100

“Test heavy”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • good teacher, easy
  • her Esl 251 is amazing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they are brief and inconsistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESLDA122 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values