AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Mayra Cruz

CD57 · CD · CHILDFIFT · CD50 · PHYCCHOLOGY · CD12 · CDCD12 · CD50CD60 · CDCCDC · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a manageable grade and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy gradingDisorganized teachingHelpful when engagedCommunity service requiredGroup discussion heavy
  • Students often describe the class as and projects are completed.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent, with and disorganization.
  • Community service and attendance requirements can add real time cost despite the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A seems realistic with completed projects and basic studying, but community service and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is usually described as personal, project-based, and not intellectually intense.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Several reviews mark attendance as mandatory, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and help, but many warn about weak teaching and disorganization.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

if projects and basic work are completed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments are often easy, but community service and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Comments split between helpful, passionate teaching and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize projects, observations, group activities, community service, and some quizzes or exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence comes from in-person classes, but mixed teaching quality.

Main concern

The main concern is disorganized instruction and .

What students said

“ .”
CD50CD60
“Do quality work and you should have no problem getting an A.”
CD12
“i dropped her because, gosh, she was so unorganized!!”
CD

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with comments mentioning easy studied midterms, study guides, and a .

Easy Midterms If StudiedStudy GuidesGroup Project FinalReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a group project final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Easy Midterms If StudiedGroup Project FinalStudy Guides
“ if you study.”
CD50
“As for the !”
CD50
“Always gives study guides!!”
CD50CD60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“While she is an disorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is a sweet person but she hardly teaches at all.”

📈 Grade Path

82/100

“Do quality work and you should have no problem getting an A.”

🧾 Workload Reality

55/100

“Good class, but requires 10 hours min. of community service on your own time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting lectures. . Ready to help.
  • She is a sweet person but she hardly teaches at all.
  • , and the class content doens't prepare you for the exam

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • The , and she gives us a little community service to do.
  • Do quality work and you should have no problem getting an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 21 reviews over many years, but many are old and some are vague or inconsistent.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CD1210 reviews
CD503 reviews
CD572 reviews
CD1 review
CD50CD601 review
Show 4 more courses
CDCCDC1 review
CDCD121 review
CHILDFIFT1 review
PHYCCHOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values