AI Rate Professor

English

Rene Anderson-Watkins

ENG165 · ENGLISH1A · LART211 · WRITING211 · EWRTD211 · EWRT1 · EWRT1B · ENG100 · READ · EWRT2 · ENG46A · EWRT1B3 · EWRT211 · EWRT1A · ELIT46A · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to become a better writer and are ready for a demanding workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring teacherHeavy readingStrong feedbackTough but fairAttendance matters
  • Students , and ability to improve writing.
  • The class requires substantial reading, writing, and .
  • Grades are earned through consistent effort, not minimal work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it requires reading, writing, attendance, and serious effort.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is not impossible, but heavy reading, essays, and close analysis make it challenging.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews say attendance is required or that .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and helps them improve.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Students describe her as tough or picky, but many also say the and improvement-based.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of reading, essays, homework, journals, quizzes, and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and effective at teaching writing.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, reading responses, journals, worksheets, quizzes, and participation.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person, and the pattern is strong teaching with heavy reading, writing, and .

Main concern

The main concern is the heavy workload and .

What students said

“It is a VERY labor intensive course with a lot of homework”
EWRT1
“She cares about her student's success.”
EWRT211
“She's a but she's fair!!”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed and limited, with quizzes, essays, and .

Reading QuizzesNo In-Class Essays In One ReviewFinal With Short AnswersTake-Home Essays MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention reading quizzes, no in-class essays in one course, and a final with short answers, but .

Reading QuizzesNo In-Class Essays In One ReviewFinal With Short AnswersTake-Home Essays Mentioned
“No in class essays :)”
EWRT1
“The final was 16 short answer and 2 2-3 paragraph responses.”
ELIT46A
“ .”
EWRT1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She assigns a lot of work, but trust me, it is not "busy work".”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 in-person reviews, , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She has helped me to become a better writer.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“It is a VERY labor intensive course with a lot of homework”

⚖️

45/100

“She's a but she's fair!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares about her student's success.
  • She is really passionate about teaching and is an amazing lady.
  • She will help you become a better writer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are a person who puts in minimal work this is not a course for you.
  • Not that easy of a grader, but she gives very constructive criticism and helps you improve in your writing.
  • Work hard and and you will do fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 26 detailed in-person reviews with consistent themes across several years.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 510
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A3 reviews
EWRT2113 reviews
ELIT46A2 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
Show 10 more courses
EWRT12 reviews
EWRT1B2 reviews
EWRT22 reviews
LART2112 reviews
ENG1651 review
ENG46A1 review
EWRT1B31 review
EWRTD2111 review
READ1 review
WRITING2111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Pass 2