AI Rate Professor

English

John Sooja

EWRTD002 · EWRT2 · EWRT1A · 1A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and can handle political lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and casualEssay rewritesPolitical lecturesTough essay gradingPop quizzes
  • Most students like his humor, approachability, and discussion-heavy English classes.
  • Grades are manageable because rewrites and , but .
  • The main risk is a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Passing looks easy with attendance and effort, but an A , and .

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class is approachable and flexible, but , and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, but quizzes and in-class work make showing up important.

and varies by course.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

, and helpful, despite concerns about politics and grading.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Essay grading is often described as tough, but rewrites and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students mention essays, reading quizzes, journals, and in-class work, but the workload is not usually called overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students praise his humor, feedback, and relatability, while a .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears to combine essays, rewrites, pop quizzes, journals, in-class assignments, and participation.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviews are in person, showing a popular but polarizing teacher with , and essay work.

Main concern

The main concern is political digression and inconsistent organization.

What students said

“ Anza.”
EWRT2
“Class is super disorganized, lectures are unrelated to literature or the material at hand.”
EWRT1A
“He is a tough grader on essays but .”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essays than traditional exams, with one review saying the .

Pop QuizzesReading QuizzesCanceled Final In One ReviewEssay RewritesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one canceled final, but do not clearly prove book, webcam, or proctoring policy.

Random Reading QuizzesPop QuizzesCanceled Final In One ReviewEssay Rewrites
“ so be sure to show up to receive credit.”
EWRT2
“He cancelled class a lot and even cancelled a speech as well as .”
EWRTD002
“ ”
EWRT2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a tough grader on essays but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person , and political classroom tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ Anza.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

84/100

“I would highly recommend taking Sooja for 1A or EWRT2.”

⚖️

52/100

“He is a tough grader on essays but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Coolest, most laid back teacher at De Anza.
  • John is hilarious and cool.
  • He is passionate and teaches you things that are useful, and I really enjoyed him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy to pass.
  • He grades but if you put in the time and work you can get an A.
  • He , so it's hard to improve.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 recent in-person reviews with strong recurring themes, but the sample is smaller and somewhat polarized.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EWRT28 reviews
EWRT1A2 reviews
1A1 review
EWRTD0021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2