AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Adrienne Pierre

COUN50 · HUMA10 · CLP75 · HUMA010 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her only if the course , because HUMA reviews show high workload and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy ReadingTough GradingUnclear RequirementsCaring FeedbackCourse Dependent
  • HUMA10 and HUMA010 reviews , and poor response time.
  • COUN50 and CLP75 reviews are much more , and easy structure.
  • The experience depends heavily on the course, with HUMA reviews driving most of the negative risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A looks costly in HUMA because students report heavy reading, homework, quizzes, and .

Online evidence is mostly HUMA-heavy and risky, while easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The course content is not consistently hard, but HUMA reviews describe a .

Online HUMA reviews describe harder course pressure, while in-person COUN50 appears much easier than in-person HUMA10.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

it was not mandatory and several reviews saying it was mandatory.

Online attendance varies by review, while as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

but strongly warn against HUMA10 and HUMA010.

Online reviews are polarized, while and one strong recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Several HUMA reviews call her a tough grader and .

Format shift

Online HUMA reviews give the , while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

HUMA reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and weekly writing.

Format shift

Online HUMA has the strongest heavy-workload evidence, while COUN50 and CLP75 look lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

but criticize unclear organization and poor responses in HUMA.

Format shift

Online reviews range from strong praise to strong criticism, and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and homework, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews conflict sharply, with one HUMA10 review calling the class unclear and one COUN50 review calling it worthwhile.

Main concern

The small in-person sample is course-dependent and inconsistent.

What students said

“ .”
HUMA10
“She gives you a lot of tips and advice to succeed in college, and thoroughly goes over the different education plans.”
COUN50

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split, with HUMA students reporting heavy work and CLP75 or and manageable tests.

Main concern

Online HUMA reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and .

What students said

“Her class in Sexuality has tons of homework and i do .”
HUMA010
“Gives lots of hws and need to buy a online access code for reading ($60).”
HUMA10
“She's very interested in your success, .”
CLP75

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show tests and quizzes tied to reading, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Test HeavyReading QuizzesTests Not Hard If You Read

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews mention tests and quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Test HeavyReading QuizzesTests Not Hard If You Read
“ ”
HUMA010
“Lots of reading and quiz.”
HUMA10
“The as long as you read!”
HUMA10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor, find another teacher for this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“It's just a .”

⚖️

30/100

“ didn't mention in the requirement.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“THIS class is NOT easy.”

❤️ Support

42/100

“She's very interested in your success, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Her class in Sexuality has tons of homework
  • Lots of reading and quiz.
  • The as long as you read!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She's very interested in your success, .
  • She gives you a lot of tips and advice to succeed in college
  • she really connects with us .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has 7 detailed reviews across two formats, but the reviews are old and highly course-dependent.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HUMA104 reviews
CLP751 review
COUN501 review
HUMA0101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2