AI Rate Professor

English

Julie Kline

EWRT211 · ERWT211 · EWRT1A · EWRT1B · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Julie Kline if you want to become a better writer and are willing to work for the grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat feedbackWriting improvementNot an easy AEssay heavyStrict but helpful
  • and say the class improves writing skills.
  • The class is often essay-heavy and , and steady effort.
  • , but not for students mainly looking for an easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

44/100

Students can earn strong grades, but repeated comments say she is strict and that an A , and real effort.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The , but the , and grading standards keep it from feeling easy.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course-easiness judgment .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory or say students must show up every day and on time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students recommend her because and helps them improve as writers despite the workload.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Many reviews say she grades essays strictly, even while and teaching quality.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

The workload often , and participation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

85/100

Students consistently praise her feedback, passion, writing mentorship, and ability to help them improve.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is mainly essay and portfolio based, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person, and they describe a helpful but work-heavy writing class with .

Main concern

The course is not an easy A because , and .

What students said

“Not an easy A, however her class will help you become a better writer.”
EWRT1A
“Total of 5 essays to do.”
EWRT211
“She is a , but a great teacher.”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; assessment is mostly essays, outlines, portfolio work, and occasional quizzes or tests.

Few TestsSimple QuizzesEssay-Based ClassPortfolio

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and simple quizzes, but most graded work appears essay based.

Few TestsSimple QuizzesEssay-Based ClassPortfolio
“Tests? Not many”
ERWT211
“ and has simple quizzes on the .”
EWRT211
“The 5th one is for the portfolio.”
EWRT211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, however her class will help you become a better writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“Julie is an amazing professor!”

📝 Writing Growth

85/100

“She is a great mentor when and she is very passionate about the subject she teaches.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

44/100

“She's a and definitely makes you work for your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She engages with the class and .
  • and she cares about students.
  • Awesome teacher no nonsense but very passionate about English and wants to help you learn and become a better reader and writer.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Total of 5 essays to do.
  • She assigns 4 out of class essays, two are 1000 words and the last two are 1500.
  • If you're looking for an easy A, probably not your class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 in-person reviews across several years repeat the same themes of , and recommendation.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A9 reviews
EWRT2117 reviews
ERWT2111 review
EWRT1B1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2