AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Reading

Nita Martin

EWRT211 · EWRT08 · ENG322 · READ211 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you mainly want an easy pass and can tolerate a frustrating class environment.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy PassRude Or CondescendingBoring LecturesTough GraderGroup Work
  • Students repeatedly say the course content is easy, but the classroom experience is unpleasant.
  • The biggest , and disorganization.
  • Grades can be reachable, but students often describe the work as busywork with strict participation or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A or passing seems very doable if students attend, participate, and complete the easy but frequent work.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they repeatedly call the class an easy pass or easy A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The material is mostly basic reading, annotations, group work, and short writing, though boredom and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they mostly describe the course content as easy or straightforward.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews say attendance is mandatory or that skipping class hurts the grade.

Only in-person reviews exist, and as required or important.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they describe the teaching style as , and frustrating.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation tone is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Grades are achievable, but many students mention .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they mix easy-pass comments with .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The work is usually easy, but students often , and busywork.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload is described as frequent but not intellectually hard.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and not very helpful.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the teaching comments are mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

The class appears driven mostly by homework, reading notes, group work, participation, and short writing, with some quizzes and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, which consistently describe an easy class with a poor teaching experience.

Main concern

Students often describe her as , and .

What students said

“Easy Class, but she has such a crabby attitude and she is very condescending”
READ211
“This class itself isnt very hard but the teacher has a .”
READ211
“Class is easy and common sense for the most part if you know how to read and understand what you read.”
READ211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but , one final, and notes allowed on the final.

Open-Notes FinalVocabulary QuizzesMidterm And FinalEasy Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and notes allowed on the final, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book rules.

Open-Notes FinalVocabulary QuizzesMidterm And FinalEasy Exams
“On the and article you're being tested on.”
READ211
“There are advanced word power.”
READ211
“ . both considerably easy.”
READ211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy Class, but she has such a crabby attitude and she is very condescending”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She isnt very prepared for her own classes and seems a little lost all the time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ . ever.”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“Just do the work and you will pass.”

⚖️

38/100

“She grades tough if its not how she personally likes it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very monotone speaking.
  • She doesn't seem too friendly and class is very boring.
  • !
  • and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Class is easy and common sense for the most part if you know how to read and understand what you read.
  • easy work. easy quizzes. take this class if you want that A lol.
  • Can seem mean, but an easy A.
  • Boring and unfriendly. Easy pass

Theme 3

⚖️ And Workload

  • The only negative thing I could say about her is she is a .
  • and if you ask for your grade, good luck.
  • assigns a lot of .

Theme 4

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • She makes you feel really stupid about any answer you give her
  • She was really mean to her students and would often get mad at us.
  • Personality you either love or hate.
  • She can be very mean if you do something wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 45 reviews across many years show a consistent pattern, though many reviews are old.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 57
2 out of 514
1 out of 515

Course coverage

READ21140 reviews
EWRT2113 reviews
ENG3221 review
EWRT081 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 7