AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Svetlana Tyuleneva

MATH8A · MATH1A · CALC1A · MATH43 · MATH240 · MATH114 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you can handle uneven teaching quality and stay on top of .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful but inconsistentHeavy homeworkExtra creditSelf-teaching riskMixed clarity
  • Older reviews describe an easy, flexible class with .
  • Later Math 1A and Math 240 reviews , and poor clarity.
  • , so online format is not supported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A looks possible because of extensions, , and easy tests in older reviews, but later reviews show homework and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Many students call the class easy, but calculus and and self-teaching.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory and sometimes not, with no stable rule across courses.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students either strongly recommend her for kindness and flexibility or warn against her because of and .

The .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

65/100

Older reviews mention , second chances, and extensions, but later .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of and paper assignments, weekly quizzes, and many problems per night.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

She is often described as caring and helpful, but several later reviews say she lacks clarity and leaves students to self-teach.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and a final, so assessment is split between assignments and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with many praising flexibility and while later reviews warn about unclear teaching and .

Main concern

The main while managing a .

What students said

“Prepare to teach yourself.”
MATH1A
“a lot of ”
MATH114
“SO !!”
MATH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Practice TestsTests And FinalWeekly QuizzesExtra Credit Corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, tests, practice tests, and a final, but .

Practice TestsTests And FinalWeekly Quizzes
“3 test, 1 final.”
MATH114
“Web assign is a must, along with weekly quizzes.”
MATH43
“ ”
CALC1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am so sad she is a part timer at De Anza. Believe me I got so lucky I got into her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“Prepare to teach yourself.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“SO !!”

⚖️

65/100

“miss the ? no worry. if u tell her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares so much about everyone passing and understanding.
  • If .
  • She is such a good professor If you have an issues regarding the happy to help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • a lot of
  • easy quizes and test
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of
  • being assigned an average of 40+ problems a night left me falling behind.
  • KEEP UP WITH HOMEWORK! Even with .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 reviews with detailed comments, but they are old and split strongly by year and course.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1A9 reviews
MATH1144 reviews
CALC1A1 review
MATH2401 review
MATH431 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH8A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1