AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Reading

Jennifer James

READD200 · READ200 · READ100 · READREAD · READING200 · READ211 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can participate constantly, follow directions exactly, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery strictParticipation requiredHarsh gradingPolarizing personalityReading and discussion heavy
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with and valuable while many warn strongly against taking her.
  • The course content is often described as easy, but , and rule enforcement make grades risky.
  • Quiet students and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The work can be simple, but and required participation make high grades unreliable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Many students call the homework and reading class easy, but discussions and strict rules raise the practical difficulty.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Students repeatedly say showing up, being on time, and participating are required to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether the student can handle strict rules, criticism, and frequent participation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Many students report very low grades, no curve, lost points for small mistakes, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework is often described as easy, but , and projects add pressure.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

Some students praise her clarity and discussions, but many describe her as rude, intimidating, unfair, or unhelpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades , and writing assignments rather than one single method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

class can help engaged students but can punish quiet or rule-breaking students heavily.

Main concern

Participation and exact formatting can dominate the grade experience.

What students said

“PARTICIPATE IN CLASS IN ORDER TO PASS.”
READ211
“The highest grade in the class is a C. There is .”
READ100
“She is very clear in her lectures, engages the class in interesting group discussions, encourages free thinking in class .”
READ211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , and strict quiz rules, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Tough TestsMidterm and FinalStrict Quiz RulesParticipation-Based Risk

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strict quiz rules, but no clear exam security policy is proven.

Tough TestsMidterm and FinalStrict Quiz Rules
“ .”
READ211
“Failed both of but passed.”
READ211
“If you're 5 seconds late .”
READ211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“PARTICIPATE IN CLASS IN ORDER TO PASS.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and polarized teaching experience; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“She is a bit intimidating at first but if you stick with the class she is actually kinda funny and is a great teacher.”

⚖️

15/100

“The highest grade in the class is a C. There is .”

📣 Participation Requirement

10/100

“PARTICIPATE IN CLASS IN ORDER TO PASS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She can seem rude or intimidating at first but she is really cool if you get to know her.
  • She does not care about if you understand or not.
  • She is very clear in her lectures, engages the class in interesting group discussions, encourages free thinking in class discussions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Her work is easy, but I suggest you still go to class.
  • VERY STRICT. . Took a lot of .
  • If you forgot to double-space for your work. You get zero.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • Participation is huge to her.
  • Class participation is necessary!!!
  • if you're not going to be out going and loud don; because participation is a must.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews across many years provide rich, consistent evidence of and participation pressure despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 517
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 517

Course coverage

READ21131 reviews
READ20010 reviews
READ1006 reviews
READD2001 review
READING2001 review
Show 1 more courses
READREAD1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Pass 2