AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Physics

Patrick Huet

PHYS4A · PHYS10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle disorganization, , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedDifficult testsLots of homeworkLenient curvesAccessible but unprepared
  • Students find him personally likable, but all three reviewers .
  • because scores are poor.
  • , and perceived unfairness create a high-risk class experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

and curves help, but , and unfairness complaints keep the A path difficult.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Physics content is , and disorganized teaching.

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

as mandatory, with no evidence of flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Every reviewed student said they would not take him .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One review says grading is very lenient and , but another reports unequal extensions and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention lots of , and assignments that may not receive credit.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is described as likable and accessible, but , and unfair.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and a presentation, so assessment is spread across several formats.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a nice but , and low student willingness to retake.

Main concern

Tests and .

What students said

“ we learned.”
PHYS4A
“ , but .”
PHYS4A
“ .”
PHYS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Difficult TestsPop QuizzesCurved Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult tests, pop quizzes, and curves, but .

Difficult TestsPop QuizzesCurved Tests
“ we learned.”
PHYS4A
“ because we do so terrible on them”
PHYS4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ we learned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting repeated , and workload; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He is a .”

🧪

25/100

“ we learned.”

⚖️

55/100

“ , but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a great guy. Very likable.
  • Patrick is a very nice and amiable guy , but he isn't the most prepared.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • because we do so terrible on them
  • .
  • I wasted a lot attending classes and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is older, so the pattern is concerning but limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHYS4A2 reviews
PHYS101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2