AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Mathematics

Kenneth Yu

MATH210 · MATH12 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can work independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeak CommunicationOptional AttendanceMixed Test LoadFew GradesHomework Heavy
  • , but students describe weak classroom value.
  • Grades and .
  • The course seems low in difficulty, but the teaching experience is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students earned B grades in low-difficulty classes, but there is no strong evidence of an easy A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The reported difficulty is low, but .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students are split because the course is manageable but the teaching and communication are weak.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades appear manageable, but being graded by few things and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

One review cites lots of homework while the .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students describe limited examples, weak class value, and poor responsiveness.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

and not many tests, with homework also mentioned.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and inconsistent assessment expectations.

Main concern

Students report and limited useful instruction.

What students said

“ , so I never went to class and still managed to do well.”
MATH12
“He teaches okay.”
MATH210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews conflict on test frequency and do not .

Conflicting Test FrequencyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Conflicting Test FrequencyFew Graded Items
“ ”
MATH12
“doesn't give a lot of tests”
MATH210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , so I never went to class and still managed to do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He teaches okay.”

📩 Communication Risk

45/100

“he never puts grades up and when you ask him about it in class he tells you to email .”

📚 Workload Signal

48/100

“ ? Not many”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches okay.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Effort

  • , so I never went to class and still managed to do well.
  • The only downside is that he never puts grades up

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • doesn't give a lot of tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they and recommendation.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH121 review
MATH2101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values