AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Humanities

Rob Clem

CLP75 · CLP70 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a and career direction.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCareer GuidanceEncouraging MentorClear FeedbackLow DifficultyStudent-Friendly Exams
  • Students consistently describe Rob Clem as encouraging, helpful, and confidence-building.
  • The course appears low difficulty, with light workload and .
  • and final, while online exam policy is not clearly proven.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

, and take-home exams suggest a strong chance of earning a high grade with reasonable effort.

Online evidence supports clear grading and low difficulty, while .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course sounds beginner-friendly and career-focused rather than conceptually difficult.

Both online and in-person reviews describe a low-stress course, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, while other reviews do not clearly state the rule.

, and in-person evidence includes one mandatory-attendance review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and gives meaningful guidance.

Both online and recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Clear grading criteria, low difficulty, a reported A, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear grading and one A, while .

Workload

Light

82/100

The workload appears light, with reflection assignments and but no reports of heavy work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reflection assignments, while and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise his feedback, encouragement, energy, approachability, and career guidance.

Format shift

and guidance, while in-person reviews emphasize personality and classroom energy.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention reflection assignments and and and exams.

Format shift

Online evidence points to assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and easygoing.

Main concern

as mandatory, but comments do not say it was harmful.

What students said

“Energetic and motivating personality; very easy going and encouraging.”
21111
“ .”
CLP75

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are strongly , and a manageable course experience.

Main concern

Online .

What students said

“ and the confidence his .”
CLP75
“ !”
CLP70

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and final, making the proven exam format student-friendly.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home Final
“ .”
CLP75

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Energetic and motivating personality; very easy going and encouraging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Great teacher!”

👍 Recommendation Level

98/100

“ !”

⚖️ Grade Friendliness

86/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher!
  • Fantastic fantastic teacher.
  • Class is never boring!

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • and the confidence his .
  • He offers great help deciding what to do with your major.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • very easy going and encouraging.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is very consistent but limited to four older reviews.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CLP752 reviews
211111 review
CLP701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values