Is this an easy A?
EasyA
78/100Many reviews call the projects and grading easy, but , and .
The Easy A evidence , while the single online review gives no grade detail.
PHOTO001 · PHTGPHTG · PHTG7 · PHTG07 · PHTG01 · PHOTOGRAPHY · PHTG007 · PHTG20 · PHOTO007 · PHOTO07 · PHOTO10 · PHOTO7 · PHOTO1 · PHTG001 · PHOTO2 · PHTG1 · 69 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many reviews call the projects and grading easy, but attendance, papers, and finals can still block a low-effort A.
The Easy A evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the single online review gives no grade detail.
Is the course easy?
The course content is usually introductory, but history-heavy lectures, papers, and technical final questions add moderate challenge.
In-person reviews describe the real difficulty pattern, while the online review is too vague to compare.
Is attendance flexible?
Several reviews say attendance is taken or affects the final grade, even when the class feels low-value.
Attendance concerns appear in in-person reviews, while the only online review says attendance was not mandatory.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend him for easy grading and lab feedback, but many warn about boring lectures and unclear teaching.
In-person reviews are polarized, while the online evidence is too thin to support a separate recommendation.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
68/100
Projects are often graded easily, but papers, finals, and subjective taste can make grading feel inconsistent.
Format shift
Lenient grading evidence is from in-person reviews; online grading evidence is not clear.
Workload
Light
74/100
Workload is usually light with a few projects, papers, and exams, though labs and prints can take time.
Format shift
In-person reviews mention light projects and some time-consuming lab work; the online review gives no workload detail.
Teaching experience
Average
61/100
He is often helpful and knowledgeable in labs, but many students find lectures boring, video-heavy, or unclear.
Format shift
Teaching evidence is almost all in person, and the single online review is not detailed enough to compare.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Grades appear to combine photo projects, attendance, papers, and final tests rather than one dominant method.
Format shift
In-person reviews mention projects, papers, attendance, and finals; online assessment evidence is unclear.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews show an easy but uneven class with helpful lab feedback, boring videos, and attendance-sensitive grading.
Main concern
Students often complain that lectures are boring and practical camera teaching can be limited.
What students said
“boring but easy class.”
“Feedback on projects are great.”
“Take different GE class, not an easy A”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
The only online review is too brief to judge the class experience reliably.
Main concern
There is almost no online evidence beyond one vague comment.
What students said
“good”
Exam style
Reviews mention papers and finals, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or strict exam controls.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention a final test, midterm paper, and review guidance, with some students finding the final harder than expected.
“Final test has a lot of technical questions.”
“final was harder than expected”
“Goes over the final (for each question) before taking it.”
Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring.
Student evidence
Top student voice
“boring but easy class. thought it would be fun to take photo. we watched A LOT of videos.”
“He is always available for feedback during the labs, and his analog lab techniques translate well to digital editing.”
“Easy A. Do not buy the book it is a waste of $75”
“if you miss more than 3 days he will fail you because even though you learn more from the book than any crap he says, your only really graded on attendance.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
50
Recent reviews read by the AI
69
Lifetime ratings
82/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is high because there are 50 reviews across many years, but most are old and only one is online.
Inside 50 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
4 reported outcomes
A 2
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1