AI Rate Professor

Film

Barak Goldman

FTV64C · NONE · FTV64 · FILMA · FILM60 · FTV060A · FILMINTR · SCWR1 · FTVD064C · FTV60C · FILM61 · FTV60BC · FTV1 · FTV060 · FTV60B · FTV60 · FILMD001 · FTV60A · FILM1 · 60A · FILM60A · ABC60 · 104 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you and can handle an informal class style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHilarious Screenwriting MentorCaring but BluntStrong FeedbackParticipation MattersUnstructured Class Style
  • Students widely praise his humor, care, and .
  • The class rewards effort and .
  • A smaller group criticizes his organization, lateness, and harsh tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Good grades are possible, but , and effort matter.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Screenwriting is not described as conceptually impossible, but the work is iterative and personally demanding.

All course and film reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory or say skipping class will hurt performance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him for humor, care, and and tone.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students mention fair or and accepted late scripts, but effort and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Work centers on scripts, papers, and or heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

The dominant view is that he is funny, caring, experienced, and helpful, though some find him unprepared or disrespectful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and final pages rather than exams.

Format shift

In-person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

who improves writing but can be disorganized and intense.

Main concern

His criticism and class structure can feel harsh or unplanned.

What students said

“Most inspiring, helpful, caring, hilarious Professor I have ever taken.”
FTVD064C
“ .”
FTV60A
“If you're willing to improve, he can help you do it.”
FTV60B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, midterm, or final exam rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very informal, natural lecture style. If you're willing to improve, he can help you do it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and fit; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Most inspiring, helpful, caring, hilarious Professor I have ever taken.”

⚖️ Effort and Grades

68/100

“Barak wants you to think that no work is perfect but you got to work hard for it.”

⚠️ Main Risk

52/100

“Barak doesn't plan out his class, he make it up as he goes along depending if anyone brings work, which only 3/5 of class does.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes 4 hour lectures fly by with his enthusiasm and great sense of humor.
  • Barak is hands down the .
  • He's a really funny and passionate teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Screenwriting is very tedious work but he helps make it as fun as possible.
  • Just DO THE WORK.
  • , but you'll have to work hard for it!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • if you get easily offended though.
  • He doesn't respect his students' works and he would tear them apart.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

104

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 detailed reviews across many years, with consistent praise and recurring criticism.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 585
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FTV60A10 reviews
FTV60BC6 reviews
60A3 reviews
FILM60A3 reviews
FTV13 reviews
Show 17 more courses
FTV60B3 reviews
FTV643 reviews
ABC602 reviews
FILM602 reviews
FTV060A2 reviews
FTV602 reviews
FILM11 review
FILM611 review
FILMA1 review
FILMD0011 review
FILMINTR1 review
FTV0601 review
FTV60C1 review
FTV64C1 review
FTVD064C1 review
NONE1 review
SCWR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

13

A 8 · A- 5

B range

4

B+ 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1