AI Rate Professor

English

Khalida Kareemi

ENGLISH1A · ENG1A · EWRTEWRT · EWR1A · EWRT1B · EWRT100 · EWRT2 · 1A · EWRT1AB · EWRIT1A · EWRT211 · WRT1A · EWRT1A · EGLISH1A · 111 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and adapt to the exact essay style she wants.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized TeachingUnclear InstructionsLenient Late WorkFavorite StudentsReading And Essays
  • , and disorganization.
  • Some students say an A is possible if and stay engaged.
  • The class is risky for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is often possible, but students say it requires doing the , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The writing content is not always described as hard, but and specific essay expectations make the class harder than it should be.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course difficulty cannot be compared by format.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

as mandatory while others do not, and participation appears important for doing well.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Despite some positive reviews, the dominant because and disorganized.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades can be reachable through effort and rewrites, but and favoritism.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention substantial reading, essays, journals, and projects, though late work can be treated leniently.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Many students describe her as unclear, late, off-topic, and and helpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mostly discuss essays, readings, journals, workshops, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized but lean negative, with and favoritism.

Main concern

and weak classroom focus.

What students said

“Get ready for a if you have her.”
EWRT1A
“She is very vague with her assignment, and I feel like class is a general waste of time.”
EWRT1A
“If you do the .”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly discuss essays and reading, and they do not clearly prove a .

Quizzes MentionedEssays And PapersExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Quizzes MentionedEssay-Based WorkExam Policy Unclear
“Quizzes are beyond easy, just do the .”
EWRT2
“If you do the .”
EWRT1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get ready for a if you have her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She is very vague with her assignment, and I feel like class is a general waste of time.”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“If you do the .”

⚖️

58/100

“She expects you to be precise, but grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Get ready for a if you have her.
  • She talks a lot and forgets about the .
  • She will eventually stop teaching class and talk about other things not related.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you do the work and show up to class, you'll do well!
  • Doing it all at the end is a pain.
  • lots of effort needed for A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Risk

  • She picks & so is the class packet.
  • .
  • Save yourself and pick someone else.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

111

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because there are 50 in-person reviews over many years with repeated patterns, though many are old and polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 528
1 out of 555

Course coverage

EWRT1A29 reviews
EGLISH1A3 reviews
EWRT1B3 reviews
EWRT23 reviews
1A2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
EWRIT1A2 reviews
ENG1A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
EWR1A1 review
EWRT1001 review
EWRT1AB1 review
EWRT2111 review
EWRTEWRT1 review
WRT1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1