AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Alysia Caryl

HUMID001 · HUMI1 · HUMI23163 · HUMI010 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take this class if you want a fairly easy humanities course and , and group work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFun classExtra creditGroup projectsMandatory attendanceModerate workload
  • Students generally find the class interesting and not very difficult.
  • Grades look friendly because students report A-range outcomes and .
  • , and several reviews mention reading, assignments, or group projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

A-range grades, low difficulty, , and , but assignments and tests still require work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Students say the class is not very difficult, though tests, readings, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

because it is interesting, manageable, and supported by .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report A-range grades, , and one comment calls the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The course has readings, assignments, and group projects, but students still describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students describe her as energetic, fun, and able to make the material interesting.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and online submissions.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an interesting, manageable class with , and some assignments.

Main concern

Students who dislike group projects or .

What students said

“She gives lots of extra credits.”
HUMI010
“You will do a lot of group projects, so if you are not into that than you might want to try a different class.”
HUMID001
“The would have imagined, but overall not terrible.”
HUMI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a midterm, but do not clearly prove book rules or .

Tests MentionedMidterm MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a midterm, but do not clearly prove book rules or .

Tests MentionedMidterm Mentioned
“The would have imagined, but overall not terrible.”
HUMI1
“Theres a mid term that fairly easy if you do the work assigned.”
HUMI23163

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I loved this class!!! I never thought that I would be into a creative minds class, but she made it fun.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, and workload themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

82/100

“she made it fun.”

82/100

“She gives lots of extra credits.”

Workload

58/100

“it requires to read, do lots of assignments, and submit online.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • she made it fun.
  • Prof Rueda has great energy, usually in a really happy mood all the time and tries to make the class interesting.

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • This class isn't very difficult
  • She gives lots of extra credits.
  • Theres a mid term that fairly easy if you do the work assigned.

Theme 3

Workload and Format

  • You will do a lot of group projects
  • there was a lot of HW but it wasn't bad.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUMI0101 review
HUMI11 review
HUMI231631 review
HUMID0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values