AI Rate Professor

English

James Wilson

EWRT1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a strong English class and are willing to keep up with , and writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong discussionsHelpful feedbackTough but fair gradingFair workloadPassionate teacher
  • Students , and passion for the material.
  • This is not an easy A, but A grades are realistic with consistent work.
  • , and participation matter, so the course rewards engagement.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly frame the course as fair effort rather than an automatic easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person EWRT1A reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is engaging and supported, but writing, reading, participation, and .

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

, and participation are reported as graded or mandatory in multiple reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and he is passionate and considerate.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grading can be tough on papers, but , and manageable quizzes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is described as fair, with reading, quizzes, participation, and major papers requiring steady effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

85/100

Students praise , and passion for teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment centers on writing, participation, quizzes, and midterm and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a highly recommended English professor with , and fair but real work.

Main concern

The main concern is that and .

What students said

“Has very good in class discussion topics, very interesting.”
EWRT1A
“Grades tough, but hell, he grades hundreds of papers”
EWRT1A
“Work load is pretty fair”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and paper-based midterm and final work.

Open Note QuizzesMidterm PaperFinal Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence mentions open-note quizzes and midterm and .

Open Note QuizzesMidterm PaperFinal Paper
“ .”
EWRT1A
“Write the midterm and .”
EWRT1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not and easy A, but not the hardest class either.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“Has a passion for what he is teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“A .”

⚖️

52/100

“Grades tough, but hell, he grades hundreds of papers”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Has very good in class discussion topics, very interesting.
  • the .
  • gives good and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not and easy A, but not the hardest class either.
  • Work load is pretty fair
  • so long as it looks like you do the reading and put some thought into your writing.

Theme 3

📌

  • , and participation are graded.
  • , and participation are graded.
  • stay on top of you're work and discuss with him if their are discrepancies.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four detailed reviews are consistent but limited and from 2016.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A4 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1