AI Rate Professor

English

Victor Vargas

ENG1B · EWRT1A · ERWAT1A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can self-direct your reading and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProQuiet lecturerSelf-directed workMixed teachingStrong writing prepLow class value
  • Reviews are polarized between students who found him intelligent and engaging and students who felt class was not useful.
  • Negative reviews emphasize quiet speaking, weak in-class value, and having to learn independently.
  • Positive reviews say the class helped with writing and advanced argumentation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades look attainable, but students describe a self-directed course with reading, essay prompts, and limited guidance.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The writing work includes advanced argumentation and can feel difficult without strong lecture support.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

One review says attendance is mandatory, while another and class can be skipped.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students who value independent writing practice may benefit, but others .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The comments do not clearly prove harsh or , and - and B.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

40/100

The , and writing preparation with limited support.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students praise his intelligence and discussions, but others say he is too quiet and hard to learn from.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and essay prompts rather than exams as the main assessment pattern.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

intelligence and discussions while others say students are mostly on their own.

Main concern

The main concern is low lecture clarity and limited value from attending class.

What students said

“You're on your own pretty much.”
EWRT1A
“The prof was one of the more intelligent ones I've taken at either campus”
ENG1B
“The and engaging”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or exam requirements.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You're on your own pretty much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and independence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“The prof was one of the more intelligent ones I've taken at either campus”

📚 Independent Work

42/100

“Read the book. Don't bother showing up to class”

👍 Recommendation Risk

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He says a lot but you his speaks like he's always in a library, almost whispery.
  • The and engaging
  • The prof was one of the more intelligent ones I've taken at either campus

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Work

  • That helps a lot in writing the 1B papers
  • , and due dates on the syllabus.
  • He sends the .

Theme 3

🚪

  • Showing up to class is a huge waste of time.
  • Don't bother showing up to class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 old reviews are available, and the ratings are strongly polarized.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EWRT1A3 reviews
ENG1B1 review
ERWAT1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values