AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Frank Jones

MATH51 · MATH1C · MATH212 · MATH1A · TRIG51 · CALC1A · MATH43 · MATH11 · STATSTAT · ONEB06 · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH10 · TRIG1 · MATH1B · MATH114 · MATHD114 · DOO1C · 111 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and only care about surviving the grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesSelf-teaching requiredHard testsLarge curvesAvoid if you need guidance
  • him.
  • Students , and full of mistakes.
  • , but the learning experience is still poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Large curves and , but many students say the and require self-teaching.

The one online review gives no grade detail, while , easy tests, and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is often made harder by , unclear explanations, and tests that students say do not match class work.

Online evidence is too vague, so the difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

as , but some reviews mark it as not mandatory.

and varies by course.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students warn against taking him because they feel they cannot learn from his teaching.

The single online review is positive, but the 49 in-person reviews are strongly negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Curves can be generous, but , and harsh grading experiences.

Format shift

The online grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but students often describe a .

Format shift

The workload judgment is .

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Students repeatedly describe unclear lectures, mistakes, poor hearing, unreadable writing, and .

Format shift

The online review is a vague positive outlier, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews , and few useful assignments.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes almost entirely from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing unclear , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students often say they cannot learn from his lectures and must study alone.

What students said

“ by Professor Jones.”
MATH41
“To get a good grade students have to learn/study on their own.”
MATH1B
“Over 80% of the class dropped!”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is positive but too vague to outweigh the .

Main concern

The online evidence is only one short comment.

What students said

“Great teacher!”
DOO1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam evidence is mostly strict, with , and some calculator limits, though .

Timed TestsHard ExamsNo Calculator In Some CoursesCurved TestsMemorization Based Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

calculator limits, memorization-based exams, and curves.

Timed TestsHard ExamsNo Calculator In Some CoursesCurved TestsMemorization Based Tests
“unfairly short amount of time given for tests and quizzes.”
MATH41
“All 4 exams are timed.”
MATH114
“he doesnt follow the workbook or let you use a calculator.”
MATH11

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, final format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ by Professor Jones.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

14/100

“Does not explain the subject well, But ”

📈 Grade Reality

55/100

“The only , but there is a reason y the curve is so large, no one gets the right answers”

⚠️

25/100

“unfairly short amount of time given for tests and quizzes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most of the and didn't understand what he was saying or teaching.
  • He makes a lot of mistakes even on simple math and people have to keep correcting him.
  • To get a good grade students have to learn/study on their own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .
  • The only
  • The , but so you can get 50/100 and still get an A.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • by Professor Jones.
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

111

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews across many years with a , though most reviews are old.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 58
3 out of 514
2 out of 520
1 out of 565

Course coverage

MATH1C8 reviews
MATH116 reviews
MATH1146 reviews
MATH415 reviews
MATH1B4 reviews
Show 13 more courses
MATH433 reviews
CALC1A2 reviews
DOO1C2 reviews
MATH102 reviews
MATH1A2 reviews
MATH2122 reviews
TRIG512 reviews
MATH421 review
MATH511 review
MATHD1141 review
ONEB061 review
STATSTAT1 review
TRIG11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1