AI Rate Professor

International Studies

Cam Vu

INTL11 · INTEL11 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can tolerate inconsistent reports and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing ReviewsHard TestsStrict PapersHelpful But InconsistentExtra Credit Reports
  • Reviews are sharply split between easy-A praise and serious GPA warnings.
  • Negative , and strict paper grading.
  • Positive reviews praise clear lectures, friendliness, , and easy exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Some students report easy A grades and , but many others warn that tests and .

, and those reviews strongly conflict.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Lectures may be clear for some students, but , and as hard.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews conflict, with and others saying it is mandatory.

, and they disagree.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on which version of the course experience you get, because praise and warnings are both intense.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Several students specifically say papers are graded hard and and reports.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload reports vary, but negative , and finals.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students praise her clarity and kindness, while others say they attended every class and still did not understand lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews frequently mention tests, midterms, finals, quizzes, and as the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some students calling her helpful and easy while and .

Main concern

The grading and .

What students said

.
INTL11
Plus she gave extra credits on the tests too.
INTL11
Her lectures are great, and she is so passionate about the messages behind the readings.
INTL11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exams easy and others calling tests and finals very hard.

Hard TestsHard FinalFinal PapersExtra Credit ReportsConflicting Exam Reports

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard TestsHard FinalEasy QuizzesExtra Credit
. so hard.
INTL11
Her quizzes and and not too long.
INTEL11
Plus she gave extra credits on the tests too.
INTL11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Don't take her class or . . so hard.

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

Her lectures are great, and she is so passionate about the messages behind the readings.

⚖️

32/100

she grades very hard for her papers.

📊 Recommendation Split

45/100

Don't take her class or . The class will harm your GPA.

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • kinda difficult to get an A in her class.
  • . .
  • I didn't even study or anything, go through her note and my grades are good.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very friendly and helpful for all students.
  • I attend every class but still do not get her lectures.
  • and funny.

Theme 3

📝

  • . so hard.
  • Her quizzes and and not too long.
  • and final papers really hard.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is useful, but credibility is reduced by old dates, extreme disagreement, and and attendance.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

INTL1110 reviews
INTEL111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

6

B 2 · B- 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values