AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Rika Fabian

SOC1A · SOC20 · SOC100 · SOCI1 · SOC1 · SOCI100 · SOCIOLOGY · SOC35 · SOC01 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want an engaging sociology class and are ready to attend, read, and study carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturerStrict ExpectationsReading QuizzesDifficult ExamsAttendance Matters
  • Students often find her funny, knowledgeable, and engaging.
  • Grades usually , and finals.
  • The online review is much harsher than the in-person pattern and as confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say , and strong exam answers.

The online evidence points to a hard grading experience, while steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The sociology content is often interesting, but fast pacing, dense readings, and GE class.

, while in-person comments more often describe challenging but learnable lecture material.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Attendance is sometimes marked mandatory and often practically required because .

The , while in-person reviews repeatedly stress showing up and taking notes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Many students recommend her for lively teaching and real learning, but strict expectations and students.

In-person reviews are mostly positive with warnings, while the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

because students mention , and little room for weak preparation.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is negative, while and tough standards.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Workload includes , and group work across many in-person reviews.

Format shift

Online workload centers on timed essay exams, while , and lecture-based exams.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students often praise her energy, humor, knowledge, and passion, though some find her vague, fast, or .

Format shift

, while the lone online review calls her disorganized.

Assessment method

Balanced

61/100

Grades appear to come from reading , and notes rather than one single method.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes timed essay exams, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a lively but , and exam preparation matter.

Main concern

Students who miss class or .

What students said

“Class was always interesting, but HARD.”
SOC01
“Not a lazy class.”
SOC20
“The but rather interesting and fun.”
SOC1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is very negative and .

Main concern

and poorly written.

What students said

“The , and it's not enough time at all and horrific in that .”
SOCI100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but generally demanding, with and difficult finals mentioned more often than student-friendly policies.

Timed Essay ExamsReading QuizzesEssay MidtermsDifficult Final

Assessment risk

Varies

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and difficult finals, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book rules.

Reading QuizzesEssay MidtermsDifficult Final
“The so make sure you study!”
SOC01
“ !!”
SOC20
“2 Midterms, one multiple choice and then 3-5 essay questions.”
SOC35

Online

The only online review says , and confusingly worded.

Timed Essay ExamsMostly Essay QuestionsConfusing Wording
“The , and it's not enough time at all and horrific in that .”
SOCI100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing professor. She keeps the subject material very up to date and relevant. If you show up to class and getting an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She has passion for what she talks about, her humor is actually funny, and she only hands out a and there.”

📚 Effort Required

56/100

“it's not easy to get an A. but if you try hard, you will end up with a good result”

⚠️

43/100

“ the theory she is asking about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes class very entertaining.
  • and very useful for the midterm.
  • She is vivid and witty and the class time flies.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a lazy class.
  • You must regurgitate everything exactly back to her to pass.
  • dont skip class and you will get a good grade.

Theme 3

📝

  • Quizzes on the reading, sometimes weekly, 2 midterms, a group project and a final.
  • The whole grade centers basically around the 2 midterms and the final
  • The and overall her way of teaching was not too good.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 42 reviews with consistent themes, but most are old and only one review is online.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 514
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC120 reviews
SOC207 reviews
SOC016 reviews
SOC353 reviews
009541 review
Show 5 more courses
SOC1001 review
SOC1A1 review
SOCI11 review
SOCI1001 review
SOCIOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1