AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Automotive Technology

Rick Maynard

AUTO63 · AUTO62A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and are willing to attend and do the work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient ExplainerHighly KnowledgeableStudent-CenteredFavorite Teacher
  • Students describe Rick Maynard as an exceptional Automotive Technology professor who knows the material deeply.
  • He is repeatedly praised for patience and for helping students understand difficult content.
  • The course does not look like a free A, because students still need to show up and do the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The comments are very positive, but the and doing the work, not getting an automatic A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material can be manageable because , but one review still rated the course difficulty as high.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online course difficulty evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and another says students should show up to do well.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and deeply respected.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews , and the only reported grade is a B.

Format shift

, and they give little direct grading evidence.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The workload does not sound overwhelming, but students are expected to show up and complete the work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students describe him as knowledgeable, patient, and one of .

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether grades .

Format shift

, and assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and classroom experience.

Main concern

Students should expect to attend and complete the work rather than rely on an effortless grade.

What students said

“He understands the material and wants you to understand the material just as much.”
AUTO63
“ ”
AUTO62A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rick is one of the best, if not, the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, effort, and student experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He understands the material and wants you to understand the material just as much.”

👍 Student Recommendation

96/100

“ ”

📈 Effort And Grades

55/100

“Care about the class 2)Show up and do your work”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He understands the material and wants you to understand the material just as much.
  • If he knows you don't understand, he will take the time until you do get the material.

Theme 2

❤️ About Student Experience

  • Rick is one of the best, if not, the .

Theme 3

📚 About Effort

  • Care about the class 2)Show up and do your work
  • After taking classes with Rick on and off for at least three years, I've determined you will have an amazing time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent and specific about teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AUTO62A1 review
AUTO631 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values