AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Biology

Kristin Jensen-Sullivan

ES56 · ESCI19 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you mainly want an easy grade, but do not rely on these old reviews for a full picture of teaching quality.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy APassionate teacherLow content depthMandatory attendance riskMixed personality feedback
  • Both reviews suggest the class is easy to pass or get an A.
  • Teaching quality is mixed between passionate and caring versus low-content and uncomfortable.
  • The evidence is thin and old, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

if students show up and complete the work.

All easy A because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course appears conceptually light, with one review saying very little content was covered.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and says students must show up to earn the A.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students agree the grade is easy, but they disagree on whether the class is enjoyable or educationally valuable.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

The grade path appears very forgiving, with one A report and another direct EZ A comment.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload appears light because students emphasize showing up, doing the work, and low content depth.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

One student praises her passion and care, while another criticizes her style and course substance.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention showing up, doing work, hikes, and activities, but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

passionate instructor, but they disagree sharply on teaching value and classroom tone.

Main concern

The class may feel low-content or personality-driven to some students.

What students said

“Show up to class and do the work and you will get an A!”
ES56
“the only thing we covered in the class was the difference between global warming and the ozone hole.”
ESCI19

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book policy, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class and do the work and you will get an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting easy grading, mixed teaching impressions, and limited evidence. Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy A Signal

92/100

“EZ A.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Kristin is super passionate about what she is teaching”

⚠️ Content Depth

84/100

“the only thing we covered in the class was the difference between global warming and the ozone hole.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up to class and do the work and you will get an A!
  • EZ A.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Kristin is super passionate about what she is teaching
  • She cares so much and she is a ball of f energy.
  • This woman is very smart

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

, and they give mixed signals about teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ES561 review
ESCI191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values