AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ron Bowman

MATH144 · MATH105 · MATH112 · MATHIIIV · MATH114 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can tolerate dry lectures and will do the homework, because the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy quizzesHelpful but boringHomework-based testsSoft voiceMixed teaching style
  • Many students say grades are reachable because quizzes and .
  • and organized, while others call lectures boring or unclear.
  • Exam and , multiple-choice exams, cheat sheets, and one closed-notes complaint.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

Getting an A is often realistic if students do the homework, because quizzes and and sometimes open-note.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math itself can be hard for weaker students, but many reviews say his structure makes it easier to pass.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some comments say attendance is optional or lightly enforced, while and lateness can be punished.

online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and help, but repeated complaints about boring lectures and low voice reduce confidence.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Many reviews describe , and replacement policies, but some report strict grading.

Format shift

and somewhat mixed.

Workload

Light

72/100

, but students still need to do it because quizzes and exams depend on it.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and organized, but many students complain that he is boring, quiet, or hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades appear driven mainly by quizzes, midterms, and as preparation rather than collected work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a and exams, but lecture quality is uneven.

Main concern

His soft voice and boring lectures make him a poor fit for students who need energetic teaching.

What students said

“Do all the hw, the questions on the and so do the hw.”
MATH114
“He is quiet so sit up front if you can't hear well.”
MATH114
“His lectures are difficult to understand and there isn't time to ask questions.”
MATH105
“Mr. !!! He clarifies all the concepts for you and .”
MATH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but many comments describe student-friendly quizzes and .

Open-Note QuizzesHomework-Based TestsMultiple-Choice ExamsFinal Cheat SheetConflicting Closed-Notes Report

Assessment risk

Varies

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support open-note , and one conflicting closed-notes complaint.

Open-Note QuizzesHomework-Based TestsMultiple-Choice ExamsFinal Cheat SheetConflicting Closed-Notes Report
“ so do the hw.”
MATH114
“All exams and .”
MATH114
“you can use a page of note.”
MATH114
“quizzes and .”
MATH114

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do all the hw, the questions on the and so do the hw.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“He takes his time in his teaching, and answers any question a student has.”

📈 Easy A Path

83/100

“Do the work and you'll pass with an A+ for sure.”

⚖️

78/100

“All the book!”

⚠️ Main Concern

55/100

“He is quiet so sit up front if you can't hear well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a really good professor and very helpful.
  • He takes his time in his teaching, and answers any question a student has.
  • Boring, monotonous and low voice.
  • His lectures are difficult to understand and there isn't time to ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's an easy A!
  • Do the work and you'll pass with an A+ for sure.
  • all the .
  • Extremely strict, will not give you credit even if you get the answer right if you don't show a step or two on your work.

Theme 3

📝

  • so do the hw.
  • All exams and .
  • For the .
  • quizzes and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because there are 50 reviews across many years with recurring, specific patterns, though the evidence is old.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11425 reviews
MATH10517 reviews
MATH1124 reviews
1052 reviews
MATH1441 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHIIIV1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1