AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Education

Linda Cochran

CD57 · CD60 · CD75 · CD71 · CD12 · CD58 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

Take her if you want a pressure.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring TeacherVery HelpfulEasy CourseFun AssignmentsDiscussion Based
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, helpful, and enjoyable.
  • The course appears easy and there are no exams.
  • as one-sided.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The low difficulty ratings, A+ report, and reachable with basic completion work.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Most reviews rate the class as very easy and describe the assignments as fun and manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while another describes her as flexible and adjusting.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes the class enjoyable.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Very low difficulty ratings and an A+ report suggest generous outcomes, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

The clearest workload review says there are no exams and only a few assignments, journals, and a paper.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students praise her as helpful, caring, thoughtful, thorough, and enjoyable.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The strongest assessment evidence says there are no exams and the course uses assignments, journals, and a research paper.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing kindness, helpfulness, easy difficulty, and enjoyable assignments.

Main concern

A minority concern is that .

What students said

“ , and a research paper/drdp.”
CD75
“Great teacher! Very caring and thorough.”
CD12
“Very sweet but she came of as very naive and one sided.”
CD71

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest review says there are no exams and .

No ExamsAssignmentsWeekly JournalsResearch Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lists assignments, weekly journals, and a research paper.

No ExamsAssignmentsWeekly JournalsResearch Paper
“ , and a research paper/drdp.”
CD75

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing teacher! Her love for children shows in all her lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Great teacher! Very caring and thorough.”

👍 Recommendation Level

91/100

“I simply love her... she is one of the . :)”

📈 Easy Grade Path

88/100

“ , and a research paper/drdp.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • LOVE HER. She is so helpful.
  • Very thoughtful teacher.
  • Great teacher! Very caring and thorough.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and a research paper/drdp.
  • very nice and helpful.I learned a lot from her and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Very sweet but she came of as very naive and one sided.
  • Sometimes people (not just me) would have an different view than the class zeitgeist and she'd gang up on them with other students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

75/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 8 reviews with consistent positive themes, but they are old and grade data is sparse.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD122 reviews
CD712 reviews
CD571 review
CD581 review
CD601 review
Show 1 more courses
CD751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values