AI Rate Professor

Mathematics & Statistics

Rebecca Fouquette

MATH42 · CRN01252 · MATH1C · MATH1A · MATH2B · CALC1A · STATS10 · MATH11 · MATH41 · MATH210 · MATH10 · MATH1B · MATH114 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take Rebecca Fouquette only if you can keep up with fast math lectures and prepare heavily for tricky tests.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing teachingFast paceHeavy homeworkTrap-heavy testsHelpful if approached
  • Students and reports of confusing, rushed lectures.
  • , and strong test performance, not just attendance.
  • The and little or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students and using help, but , and heavy effort for modest grades.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The math content is often fast-paced and test-focused, so students who fall behind struggle quickly.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some reviews mark attendance as mandatory while others mark it as .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her when they want a serious math class, but many warn against her because of , and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students repeatedly , and low outcomes despite doing the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and constant practice.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and helpful, but and discouraging responses to questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and finals, with exams carrying major risk.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is from in-person math classes, with strong disagreement between students who learned a lot and students who felt lost.

Main concern

and lectures.

What students said

“ .”
MATH1B
“She got mad easily and the .”
MATH10
“ .”
MATH1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent quizzes and , while a few say tests reuse homework or lecture examples.

Trap-heavy testsWeekly quizzesMultiple midtermsFinal examHomework-based test material in some classes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and difficult exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policies.

Trap-heavy testsWeekly quizzesMultiple midtermsFinal exam
“3 midterms 1 final in which .”
MATH11
“ .”
MATH1B
“ , as some of the questions were from the .”
MATH1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work hard for your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ .”

⚠️

30/100

“ .”

📚 Effort Required

42/100

“She makes you work hard for your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made me understand derivatives when other instructors failed to do so.
  • She goes really fast sometimes explaining it while people are writing than not explaining again.
  • but got mean later on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • don't expect to pass unless you put in a lot of time in
  • if you do all your work.
  • Work hard get an A.

Theme 3

📝

  • HW is easy but a lot.
  • a test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many math courses, with consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 58
3 out of 57
2 out of 58
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH1017 reviews
MATH1B10 reviews
MATH1144 reviews
MATH1A4 reviews
MATH424 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH113 reviews
MATH2B2 reviews
CALC1A1 review
CRN012521 review
MATH1C1 review
MATH2101 review
MATH411 review
STATS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1