AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Zac Swigart

ARTS · MEDICINE · SJ101 · PHSM201 · MED11 · SX101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

unless you can verify current course quality from newer sources.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed reviewsLow-detail feedbackQuestionable teachingEasy difficultyOld evidence
  • The review set is old, inconsistent, and often too vague to support a confident judgment.
  • Some students rated him highly, but several comments are negative or unrelated to teaching quality.
  • Difficulty appears low overall, but grade and workload evidence is thin.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly low and one A+ is reported, but comments do not clearly describe an .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Most difficulty ratings are low, but the comments do not give enough course-content detail to call it effortless.

Only in-person evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

One review says attendance was mandatory, while the .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

The negative comments are strong and the positive comments are too brief to offset the weak overall pattern.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

One A+ and low difficulty suggest possible leniency, but claim.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews provide evidence.

Workload

Light

76/100

Most difficulty ratings are low and there are .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews provide evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Comments range from very positive to harshly negative, with several vague or low-quality reviews reducing confidence.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews provide evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, but they do not describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and often vague, with both very positive and very negative ratings.

Main concern

Several comments are too unclear or unserious to support strong conclusions.

What students said

“awesome professor!!!!!!!!!”
ARTS
“I didn't learn thing from him. !”
MEDICINE
“half the students present out-classed his anatomical knowledge, but his mah jong skills are formidable.”
PHSM201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, exam difficulty, book rules, webcam use, or proctoring.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I didn't learn thing from him. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and evidence quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“half the students present out-classed his anatomical knowledge, but his mah jong skills are formidable.”

👍 Recommendation Level

36/100

“I didn't learn thing from him. !”

📘 Course Ease

70/100

“awesome professor!!!!!!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • awesome professor!!!!!!!!!
  • I didn't learn thing from him. !

Theme 2

⚠️ About Evidence Quality

  • constantly giving away furniture
  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

The six reviews are very old, inconsistent, and often vague or unrelated to classroom evidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARTS1 review
MED111 review
MEDICINE1 review
PHSM2011 review
SJ1011 review
Show 1 more courses
SX1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values