AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Computer Information Systems

James Carr

CIS56 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value real-world knowledge and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeableReal World ExperienceSometimes Unclear
  • Students describe him as knowledgeable and experienced.
  • Clarity is inconsistent, with some lectures not easy to follow.
  • There is too little .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The student earned an A, but the review does not prove that the A was easy or low effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course appears moderately difficult, with a difficulty rating of 3 and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

The review is mildly positive because he is knowledgeable, but it also notes clarity issues.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The student received an A, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

He is described as knowledgeable with real-world experience, though .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The but .

Main concern

Lecture clarity may vary.

What students said

“good most of the time but . Super knowledgeable. Has real world experience.”
CIS56

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove the .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“good most of the time but . Super knowledgeable. Has real world experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“good most of the time but . Super knowledgeable. Has real world experience.”

📘 Course Difficulty

50/100

“Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3”

⚖️

55/100

“A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • good most of the time but .
  • Super knowledgeable.
  • Has real world experience.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values