AI Rate Professor

Physics

Tatiana Seletskaia

PHY2B · PHYS50 · PHYS050 · PHYS4A · PHYSICS50 · PHY50 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you are willing to do the and can handle mixed lecture clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework HeavyCaring TeacherMixed ClarityEasy Homework-Based ExamsSerious Physics Content
  • Students disagree strongly on teaching quality, from excellent and and ineffective.
  • Grades can be reachable because and .
  • The , and needing to self-study unclear material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic because and , but students must keep up with steady work.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The exams may be easy, but physics material is serious and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

The only , and one review notes students leave after quizzes.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

She works for students who learn through homework and self-study, but not for .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

and homework-based exams, even though understanding the lectures can be uneven.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Reviews mention , and a heavy but .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Students praise her care and detail, but several comments criticize clarity, accent, test grammar, or weak understanding after class.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, with homework carrying unusual weight for physics.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

students praise her care and , but and heavy routine work.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and daily workload are the main risks.

What students said

“ .”
PHYS4A
“students don't understand that much in her class; that makes hard to get a good grade.”
PHY2B
“heavy but manageable, with some effort can score A.”
PHYS50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say tests and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Weekly QuizzesHomework-Based ExamsEasy Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Weekly QuizzesHomework-Based ExamsEasy Tests
“Her test and .”
PHY2B
“Exams and .”
PHY50
“Quizzes weekly, many students will leave right after and .”
PHYS050

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“heavy but manageable, with some effort can score A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“I've tried out 3 physics teachers at Foothill, and have learned the most from Seletskaia.”

📈 Grade Path

72/100

“Exams and .”

⚠️ Workload Risk

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an excellent professor.
  • She is an awesome teacher ! She cares about her student a !!!
  • students don't understand that much in her class; that makes hard to get a good grade.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Her test and .
  • heavy but manageable, with some effort can score A.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Quizzes weekly, many students will leave right after and .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 , and the opinions are polarized across teaching quality and clarity.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHY2B1 review
PHY501 review
PHYS0501 review
PHYS4A1 review
PHYS501 review
Show 1 more courses
PHYSICS501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values