AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Amanda Hurley

ACCT001B · ACCOUNTING1B · ACCT1A · ACCT001B62 · A1B · ACCT1B · ACCTIB · 1B · ACCTD001A · ACCTD001B62 · ACCTD001B61 · ACCT001B61 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take Amanda Hurley if and strong grade support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear accounting teacherHelpful and caringGenerous extra creditReasonable examsStrongly recommended
  • Students consistently describe her lectures as , and easy to follow.
  • Grades are helped , and practice exams.
  • Accounting can be fast-paced, but her teaching makes the subject manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Getting an A looks very realistic because students , and straightforward tests.

The Easy A evidence , while the single online review only confirms an A grade and strong support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Accounting is sometimes complex or fast-paced, but .

In-person reviews provide the main evidence on course difficulty, while the online review does not discuss content challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

it mandatory and others marking it not mandatory or not saying.

The , while in-person reviews include both mandatory and non-mandatory reports.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students recommend her very strongly because , and gives many ways to succeed.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation evidence is much stronger in the larger in-person sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

because students mention , a dropped midterm, practice exams, and multiple A or A+ outcomes.

Format shift

, while the online review only adds one A grade.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload appears manageable, with and readings but repeated comments that the class is fair and well balanced.

Format shift

and reading, while the online review does not give workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and able to make accounting easier.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, but .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment seems exam-centered with , and review preparation.

Format shift

, and assignments, while online assessment evidence is unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise , and generous success opportunities.

Main concern

, and a fast pace, so success requires steady study.

What students said

“ and easy to follow.”
ACCT1B
“Do it and you will get an A.”
ACCT1B
“It is a fast-paced class.”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and emphasizes care, helpfulness, and an A grade.

Main concern

There is too little online evidence to judge detailed workload or .

What students said

“She really cares about her students and their success.”
ACCTD001B62

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard but fair, with no cheat , and one dropped midterm mentioned.

Straightforward TestsNo Cheat SheetsPractice ExamDropped MidtermMultiple Choice Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe straightforward , and a dropped midterm.

Straightforward TestsNo Cheat SheetsShort Multiple Choice QuizzesDropped Midterm
“ , but the .”
ACCT1B
“ and multiple choice.”
ACCTIB
“2 mid-terms with the lowest one dropped and 1 final.”
1B

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher!!!! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and easy to follow.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

97/100

“ !!!”

⚖️ Grade Support

90/100

“There is . Do it and you will get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She presented concepts clearly and was more than willing to work through examples with the class.
  • Organized and instructive in her lectures.
  • She made even hard topics in Accounting easy.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Exams

  • The .
  • Pretty many extra credits.
  • The .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and .
  • She really cares about her students and their success.
  • She will answer and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 23 consistent reviews with rich detail, but they are old and mostly from one time period.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT1B10 reviews
ACCOUNTING1B2 reviews
ACCT1A2 reviews
1B1 review
A1B1 review
Show 7 more courses
ACCT001B1 review
ACCT001B611 review
ACCT001B621 review
ACCTD001A1 review
ACCTD001B611 review
ACCTD001B621 review
ACCTIB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 4