AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Dunlap Katie

ESL262 · ESL252 · ESL263 · ESL272 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid Dunlap Katie unless you are ready for , and a potentially frustrating class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkHarsh grading concernsBoring class reportsMixed helpfulnessAvoid unless hardworking
  • Reviews are , and class value.
  • One review says tests match class material, but the strongest comments warn about poor grades and .
  • The evidence is limited and old, so confidence is low even though the tone is concerning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A looks risky because students , and even D or F outcomes.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course appears challenging because students mention a lot of , and harsh grade outcomes.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

, but one student says she remembers names and knows who is absent.

, and online evidence is absent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because the class is described as heavy, boring, unfair, and grade-risky.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

because students directly mention unfair grades and a risk of D or F outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload appears heavy because students mention a lot of homework and reading assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching quality is weak overall because negative comments about boring class and poor coverage outweigh the one helpful review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

and tests based on class material.

Format shift

, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and poor grade outcomes.

Main concern

Students warn that the class can be punishing if you are not highly disciplined.

What students said

“She gives us a lot of homework”
ESL262
“ if you wanna get a D or F on your grade!”
ESL272
“she gave unfair grade on all your work.”
ESL263

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests based on class material, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

QuizzesTests Based On Class Material

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes and tests from class materials, but .

QuizzesTests Based On Class Material
“Her quizzes and class.”
ESL252
“The questions were based on the main idea of the reading”
ESL252

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you wanna get a D or F on your grade!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching quality. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Grade Risk

18/100

“ if you wanna get a D or F on your grade!”

📚 Workload

25/100

“She gives us a lot of homework”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

28/100

“her class is really boring.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • she gave unfair grade on all your work.
  • if you wanna get a D or F on your grade!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She gives us a lot of homework
  • Her amount of .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • When I don't and explained to the class.
  • but only taught us 2 pages through the whole quarter!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 old reviews are available, and the comments are intense but limited in detail and consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL2521 review
ESL2621 review
ESL2631 review
ESL2721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values